Optimization of crop geometry and nutrient requirements of medium duration pigeonpea hybrid under rainfed condition

Authors

  • V.V. GOUD Pulses Research Unit, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Agricultural University, Akola, Maharashtra - 444 104, India Author
  • H.B. KALE Pulses Research Unit, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Agricultural University, Akola, Maharashtra - 444 104, India Author
  • N.M. KONDE Pulses Research Unit, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Agricultural University, Akola, Maharashtra - 444 104, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v25i3.1079

Keywords:

Crop geometry, Economics, NPKSZn, Pigeonpea hybrid

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out to study crop geometry and nutrient requirements of pigeonpea hybrid ‘GTH-1’ during Kharif 2007-09 under rainfed conditions of Akola, Maharashtra. Planting of pigeonpea hybrid at a row spacing of 90 x 30 cm was found optimum. Amongst nutrient combinations, NPKSZnSO4::20:60:25:20:15 kg/ha was optimum for realizing higher crop growth, seed yield, net return and benefit cost ratio (BCR). Photosynthetic Active Radiation (PAR) received by the canopy was the highest at wider spacing of 90 x 30 cm. Soil available N, P, K and S at harvest of pigeonpea hybrid were significantly influenced by spacing and nutrient levels over the initial level. Interaction effects on various plant and soil attributes due to different nutrient combinations and spacing were not significant.

References

Anonymous 2011. All India Coordinated Pigeonpea Improvement Project 2011-12, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India. Mula MG, Saxena KB, Kumar RV, Mula RP and Rathore A. 2010b.

Response of spacing on yield and on returns of CMS-based medium duration pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) hybrid. Green Farming 1: 331-335.

Mula MG, Saxena KB, Rathore A and Kumar R. 2010a. Response to spacing and irrigation in a medium-duration CMS-line of pigeonpea. Journal of Food Legumes 20: 186-190.

Shankaralingappa BC, Shivaraj B, Sudhir K and Vishwanatha KP. 2000. Interaction effect of phosphorus and sulphur on uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulphur by pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan).

Indian Journal of Agronomy 45: 348-352.

Shivran DR and Ahlawat IPS. 2000. Crop productivity, nutrient uptake and soil fertility as influenced by cropping system and fertilizers in pigeonpea-wheat cropping system. Indian Journal of Agriculture

Science 70: 815-819.

Shivran PL. 1998. Studies on phosphorus and sulphur fertilization in pigeonpea and their residual effect on the succeeding wheat. Ph.D. Thesis, IARI, New Delhi, India.

Sinha AC, Mandal BB and Jana PK. 1988. Physiology analysis of yield variation in irrigated pigeonpea in relation to time of sowing, row spacing and weed control measures. Indian Agriculturist 32: 177-185.

Subehia SK and Sharma SP. 2002. Nutrient budgeting in a long-term fertilizers experiment. Transactions 17th world congress of soil science (Bangkok, Thailand, 14-21 August 2002) 33: 1-8.

Venkataratnam N, Rao IM and Sheldrake AR.1984. Effects of plant population on post - rainy season pigeonpea yields. International Pigeonpea Newsletter 3: 20-22.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-07

Issue

Section

Short Communication

How to Cite

Optimization of crop geometry and nutrient requirements of medium duration pigeonpea hybrid under rainfed condition. (2024). Journal of Food Legumes, 25(3), 243-245. https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v25i3.1079