Performance evaluation of mechanical planters for planting of chickpea and pigeonpea

Authors

  • M.K. SINGH Division of Crop Production, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur - 208 024, Uttar Pradesh, India Author
  • NARENDRA KUMAR Division of Crop Production, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur - 208 024, Uttar Pradesh, India Author
  • PRASOON VERMA Division of Crop Production, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur - 208 024, Uttar Pradesh, India Author
  • S.K. GARG Division of Crop Production, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur - 208 024, Uttar Pradesh, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v25i2.1190

Keywords:

Broadcasting, Dibbling, Planter, Seed drill, Sowing equipment

Abstract

Pulse productivity is significantly affected by poor emergence, lack of uniformity and difficulty in achieving target population and weed infestation. Commercial sowing equipments such as seed drill and seed-cum-fertilizer drill operated by animal, power tiller and tractor, meter high and non-uniform seed rate causing thinning as an extra operation. Under this situation, a commercial bed planter and CIAE inclined plate planter were evaluated for planting of chickpea and pigeonpea to assess their suitability. The commercial and CIAE incline plate planter have resulted in a mean plant spacing of 115 mm and 136 mm, respectively for Kabuli chickpea against the set spacing of 100 mm. The missing and multiple seed percentage were 15.3% and 7.7% for commercial bed planter as compared to 27.2% and 9.1% in CIAE inclined plate planter, respectively. Uniform depth of seed placement was obtained for both the planters which were within the permissible range of 50-60 mm for chickpea and pigeonpea.

References

Bracy RP, Parish RL and Mc COY JE. 1999. Precision seeder uniformity varies with theoretical spacing. Hort Technology 9: 47-50.

CIAE 2010. Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering Product Catalogue, 2010, Bhopal. 34 pp.

Dubey SK, Sah U and Singh SK. 2011. Participatory impact assessment of technological interventions disseminated in Bundelkhand region of Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Food Legumes 24: 36-40.

Kachman DS and Smith JA (1995). Alternative measures of accuracy in plant spacing for planters using single seed metering. Transactions of the ASAE 38: 379-387.

Kathirvel K, Shivaji KP and Manian R. 2001. Development and evaluation of a till planter for cotton. Agricultural Mechanisation in Asia, Africa and Latin America, Japan 32: 23-27.

Kathirvel K, Shivaji KP and Manian R. 2005. Performance evaluation of planters for cotton crop. Agricultural Mechanisation in Asia, Africa and Latin America, Japan 36: 61-65.

Kepner RA, Bainer R and Barger EL. 1987. 1st Indian Ed. Principles of farm machinery. CBS Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi.

Pandey MM. 2009. Country Report India -Indian Agriculture an Introduction. Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering Bhopal, India. Presented in Fourth Session of the Technical Committee of APCAEM 10-12 February 2009, Chiang Rai, Thailand.

Singh RC, Singh G and Sarswat DC. 2005. Optimization of design and operational parameters of a pneumatic seed metering device for planting of cotton seeds. Biosystem Engineering 92: 429-438.

Yadav BG and Yadav RNS. 1987. Design and development of tractor drawn pneumatic precision planter for field experiments. Journal of Agricultural Engineering ISAE 24: 227-232.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Performance evaluation of mechanical planters for planting of chickpea and pigeonpea. (2024). Journal of Food Legumes, 25(2), 131-134. https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v25i2.1190