Characterization and genetic diversity analysis in field bean [Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet] collections of Karnataka

Authors

  • B.N. SAVITHA Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad – 580 005, Karnataka, India Author
  • R.L. RAVIKUMAR Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad – 580 005, Karnataka, India Author
  • DEEPAKKUMAR G. SHINDE Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad – 580 005, Karnataka, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v25i1.1207

Keywords:

Dolichos bean, Field bean, Genet ic diversity, Germplasm, Pendal type

Abstract

Forty three pendal and seventy one non-pendal genotypes were collected from different parts of Karnataka. The pendal and non-pe ndal genotype s we re evaluate d separatel y in two different experiments following randomized complete block desi gn at Dharwad during kharif 2007-08. In orde r to characterize and differentiate the genotypes, observations on 20 quantitative and 26 qualitative characters at different growth stages of the plants were recorded. The analysis of variance suggested significant variation for all the characters in both pendal and non-pendal genotypes. GCV was the highest for number of green pods/plant and green pod yield/plant in both the types. High variation was observed for leaf, inflorescence, flower, pod and seed characters among pendal and non-pendal genotypes. D2 statistic grouped the non-pendal genotypes into 13 distinct clusters, indicating ample diversity among the genotypes. The 43 pendal type genotypes were grouped into six clusters and had high range of inter-cluster distance compared to non-pendal types, suggesting greater diversity among the genotypes. However, gene tic dive rsi ty was not rel ated to geographical diversity in both pendal and non-pendal types. Diverse genotypes in both pendal (DDGC 18, DDGC 35, GL 509, GL 502 and DDGC 32) and non-pendal (GL 63, GL 77, GL 56, GL 70 and GL 37) types were identified for hybridization to generate high variability. Wide variability for all the qualitative traits (such as growth habit, branch orientati on, stem pigmentation, and the like) was observed in both pendal and non-pendal types.

References

Anonymous. 2006. Agricultural Statistics at a glance. Directorate of Economics and Statistics. Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi.

Basavarajappa PS and Byre Gowda M. 2000. Genetic divergence among field bean (Lab lab pu rpureus L. Sweet) cultivars of Southern Karnataka. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 13: 134-137.

Borah P and Shadeque A. 1992. Studies on genetic variability of common Dolichos bean. Indian Journal of Horticulture 49: 270-273.

Byre Gowda M. 2005. Genetic variability in Dolichos lablab collections. Paper presented during training programme on molecular marker techniques for crop imp rov emen t at UAS, Ban galo re during November 7-23, 2005, sponsored by Krik house trust John-Innes, Centre.

Chaudhary B. 1972. Vegetables. NBT, India, New Delhi. Pp 220.

Manjunath A, Chandrappa HM, Vishanath SR and Shivashankar G. 1973. Anthyocyanin genetics of Dolichos. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 33: 345-346.

Mass BL, Ramni HJ, Hean Hanson and Pengelly BC. 2005. Determining sources of diversity in cultivated and wild Lablab purpureus related to provenance of germplasm by using amplified fragment length polymorphism. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52: 683-695.

Mohan N and Aghora TS. 2006. Variability, diversity and distribution of Dolichos (lablab purpureus L.) and races in the central districts of Tamin Nadu. In: Proceedings of First International Conference on Indigenous Vegetables and Legumes, 12-15 December, 2006, ICRISAT, Patancheru, AP, India.

Nandi A, Tripathi P and Lenka D. 2000. Genetic divergence in hyacinth bean (Dolichos lablab). Indian Journal of Agricultur al Sciences 70: 450-451.

Nasreen Sultana, Ozaki Y and Ok ubo H. 2001. Morphological and physiological variation in lablab bean (Lablab purpureus L. Sweet). Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture (Kyushu University) 45: 465-472.

Pujari I. 2000. Evaluation on genetic variability in country bean with conventional and molecular strategies. M Sc (Ag) Thesis, OUAT, Bhubaneswar.

Purseglove JW. 1 968. Tropical crops, Dicotyledons-1. Lon gmans, London, UK. Pp 332.

Rao CH. 1987. Genetic studies in garden bean. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 47: 347-350.

Savitha BN. 2008. Characterization of Avare (Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet) local collections for genetic variability. M Sc (Ag) Thesis, UAS, Dharwad.

Shivashankar G, Chikkadevaiah and Hiremath RC. 1977. Germplasm of field bean. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 37: 353-370.

Shivashankar G, Kulkarni RS, Shashirdhar HE and Mahishi DM. 1989. Field bean (Lab lab pu rpureus L. Sweet). Botan y Culture and Improvement. Report of UAS Bangalore.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Characterization and genetic diversity analysis in field bean [Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet] collections of Karnataka. (2024). Journal of Food Legumes, 25(1), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v25i1.1207