Variability studies in some genotypes of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under rice fallow
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v25i1.1218Keywords:
Chickpea, Clust er analys is, Correlation, Genetic variability, Milling quality, Path analysisAbstract
This investigation was carried out to identify superior genotypes of chickpea on the basi s of yield and milling quality traits grown under rice fallow condition during genetic coefficient of variation, heritability and genetic advance were observed for total pods/plant, effective pods/plant, 100 seed weight, seed yield/ plant and biological yield. S eed yield shared positive and significant association wi th harvest index, bi ological yield, effective pods/plant, total pods/plant, secondary branches and primary branches. Biological yield, harvest index, days to maturity, effective pods/plant and seeds/pod exhibited maximum direct positive effect on seed yield/plant. Some lines such as ‘ICCV 07111’, ‘Pusa 372’, ‘Vaibhav’, ‘PG 186’, ‘JG 16’, ‘DCP 92-3’, ‘JG 11’ and ‘JG 14’ had better milling quality traits.
References
Anbessa Y, Warkentin T, Vandenberg A and Ban M. 2006. Heritability and predicted grain from selection in component of crop duration in divergent chickpea cross population. Euphytica 152: 1–8.
Arshad M, Bakhsh A, Bashir M and Ahqqani M. 2002. Determining the heritability and relationship between yield and yield components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany 34: 237 – 245.
Babbar A and Patel SK. 2005. Correlation and path analysis in desi chickpea under Kymore Plateau Zone of Madhya Pradesh. J.N.K.V.V. Research Journal 39: 47-51.
Bhushan S and Jaiswal HK. 2009. Correlation and path analysis in short duration chickpea. Journal of Food Legumes 22: 302.
Bicer BT. 2009. The effect of seed size on yield and yield component of chickpea. African Journal of Biotechnology 8: 1482 –1487.
DAC. 2011. Agriculture statistics at a glance. Directorate of Economics & Statsitics, Department of Agriculture & Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India, New Delhi.
Dwivedi KK and Gaibriyal ML. 2009. Assessment of genetic diversity of cultivated chickp ea (Cicer arietinum L.) Asian Jo urnal of Agricultural Science 1 (1): 7-8.
Hahid S, Malik R, Bakhsh A, Asif MA, Iqbal U and Iqbal SM. 2010. Assessment of genetic variability and interrelationship among some agronomic traits in chickpea. International Journal of Agricultural Biology 12: 81-85.
Meena H, Kumar SJ and Desmukh PS. 2006. Genetic variability and correlation studied for traits related to drought tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 6: 140.
Muhammad A, Bakhsh A and Gahoor A. 2004. Path coefficient analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under rainfed condition. Pakistan Journal of Botany 36: 75-81.
Pande S, Sharma M, Neupane RK, Chaudhary RN, Rao JN, Grazywacz D, Bourai VA and Stevension P C. 2 009 . In tegrated crop management strategy for improved chickpea production and its impact on liveho od of f armer s in Nepal. Plant protection association of India, Hydrabad, India.
Singh A and Sandhu JS. 2008. Correlation and path analysis in chickpea under different environments. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 21: 32-33.
Talebi R, Fayaz F and Jelodar AB 2007 correlation and path coefficient analysis of yield component of chickpea (Cicer arictinece L.) under dryland condition in the west of Iran. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences : 1151–1154.
Tomar OK, Singh D and Singh D. 2011. Genetic divergence in chickpea. Journal of Food Legumes 24: 296-298.
Wadikar PB, Ghodke MK and Pole SP. 2010. Genetic Divergence for productivity traits in chickpea. Journal of Food Legumes 23: 245-246.
