Heterosis and combining ability studies in greengram
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v24i4.1234Keywords:
Combining ability, Exotic genotypes, Greengram, Heterosis, Per se performanceAbstract
Fifty six F1 hybrids obtained by crossing four lines and fourteen exotic testers in a line × tester mating design were used to generate information on gene action, combining ability and heterosis in greengram. These parents and crosses were grown in a randomized complete block design with two replications. Except for seed fertility, the magnitude of SCA variance was greater than GCA variance for all the characters indicating preponderance of non-additive gene action. The parents ‘Co 6’, ‘Barimung 7’ and ‘Binamung 7’ were identified as good general combines for yield and yield contributing characters. The crosses ‘VBN(Gg) 3’ × ‘SML 1023’ and ‘VBN(Gg) 3’ בEC 396117’ were found to have superior mean, sca effects and standard heterosis for number of seeds per pod and 100 seed weight and number of clusters per plant and single plant yield, respectively. Hence, these crosses could be advanced to obtain high yielding segregants with determinate growth habit, synchronised maturity, long pod, bold and shiny seeds in greengram.
References
Ajmal SU, Zubair M and Anwar M. 2007. Genetic implication of yield and its components in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Pakistan Journal of Botany 39: 1229-1236.
Anbumalarmathi J, Rangasamy P and Babu S. 2004. Combining ability and heterosis for yield and yield components in greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Madras Agricultural Journal 91: 79-82.
Annual Report. 2010. AICRP on MULLaRP. IIPR, Kanpur – 208024 (U.P.), India.
Chand P and Rao CR. 2002. Studies on gene action in a biparental cross in blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 62: 347-348.
Dana I and Gupta TD. 2001. Combining ability in blackgram. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 61: 170-171.
Fonseca A and Patterson FL. 1968. Hybrid vigour in a seven parent diallele cross in common winter wheat (T. aestivum L.). Crop Science 8: 85-88.
Kempthorne O. 1957. An introduction to genetic statistics. John Wiley and Sons Inc., Newyork. Pp 458 – 471.
Khattak GSS, Haq MA, Ashraf M, Khan AJ and Zamir R. 2002. Genetic architecture of secondary yield components in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Breeding Science 52:235-241.
Kumar S, Gupta S, Chandra S and Singh BB. 2004. How wide is the genetic base of pulse crops. In: M Ali, BB Singh, Shiv Kumar and Vishwadhar (Eds), Pulses in New Perspective. Indian Society of Pulses Research and Development, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India. Pp 211-221.
Loganathan P, Saravanan K, Thangavel P and Ganesan J. 2001. Heterosis for yield and yield components in greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Legume Research 24: 77-81.
Shinde NV and Deshmukh RB. 1989. Heterosis in mungbean. Indian Journal of Pulses Research 2: 119-124.
Singh BB and Dikshit HK. 2003. Combining ability studies for yield and architechtural traits in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 63: 351-352.
Singh TP, Singh KB and Malhotra RS. 1975. Heterosis and combining ability in lentil. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 45: 159-263.
Singh VK, Tyagi K, Tamer AK, Singh MN and Nandanl R. 2007. Gene action for yield and yield attributing traits in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Legume Research 30: 29-32.
Turner JM. 1953. A study of heterosis in upland cotton. II. Combining ability and in breeding effects. Agronomy Journal 43: 487-490.




