Genetic divergence and character association in Indo-African derivatives of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]

Authors

  • J.B. PATEL Centre of Excellence for Research on Pulses, S.D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar- 385 506, Gujarat, India Author
  • S. ACHARYA Centre of Excellence for Research on Pulses, S.D. Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar- 385 506, Gujarat, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v24i3.1267

Keywords:

Character association, Cluster, D2 analysis, Genetic divergence, Genetic variability, Indo-African derivatives

Abstract

Genetic divergence and character association in sixty four F6 progenies (Indo-African derivatives) of pigeonpea indicated significant variability. High heritability coupled with moderate to high genetic advance for grain yield/plant, plant height, number of pods/plant, days to 50% flowering and days to maturity showed importance of additive gene effects and thereby higher selection value for these traits. Grain yield was significantly and positively correlated with plant height, branches/plant, pods/plant, pod length, seeds/pod and 100-seed weight. Path coefficient analysis too revealed that pods/plant had the highest positive direct effect on grain yield/plant. Accordingly, pods/plant, pod length, seeds/pod and 100-seed weight may be considered during selection. The sixty-four derivatives were grouped in eight clusters with inter-cluster distances ranging from 2.124 to 5.463, indicating substantial diversity among the derivatives. Cluster VIII (63.81 g) had the highest mean values for grain yield/plant followed by cluster VI (52.78 g) and cluster VII (32.93 g). Therefore, genotypes from the above clusters may be exploited in both conventional and heterosis breeding programmes.

References

Acharya S and Patel JB. 2011. Characterization of diversified cytoplasmic genetic male sterile (A) and restorer (R) lines of pigeonpea for good heterotic combinations. Journal of Food Legumes 24: 28-32.

Al-Jibouri HA, Miller PA and Robinson HF. 1958. Genotypic and environmental variance and covariance in an upland cotton cross of interspecific origin. Agronomy Journal 50: 633-637.

Basavarajaiah D, Gowda M Byre, Lohithaswa HC and Kulkarni RS. 2000. Assessment of pigeonpea germplasm and isolation of elite genotypes for Karnataka. Crop Research 20: 444-448.

Burton GW and De Vane EH. 1953. Estimating heritability in tall Fescue (Festuca arundiacese) from replicated clonal material. Agronomy Journal 45: 478-481.

Burton GW. 1952. Quantitative inheritance in grasses. Proceeding of 6th International Grassland Congress 1: 227-283.

Dewey DR and Lu KH. 1959. A correlation and path analysis of components of crested wheat grass seed production. Agronomy Journal 51: 515-518.

Gohil RH. 2006a. Genetic divergence in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Research on Crops 7: 748-750.

Gohil RH. 2006b. Genetic variability in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] for grain yield and its contributing traits. Crop Research 31: 478-480.

Jeswani KM. 1986. Breeding strategies for the improvement of pulse crops. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 46: 267-280.

Johnson HW, Robinson HF and Comstock PF. 1955. Estimation of genetic and environmental variability in sorghum. Agronomy Journal 47: 314-318.

Mahalanobis PC. 1936. On the generalized distance in statistics. Proceedings of National Institute of Science (India). 2: 49-55.

Rao CR. 1952. Advanced Statistical methods in Biometrical Research. Edn. I. John Willey and Sons, Inc., New York. Pp. 337-363.

Sandhu TS, Reddy PK and Gumber RK. 1993. Assessment of genetic divergence in pigeonpea germplasm. International Pigeonpea Newsletter 17: 8-10.

Singh J, Bhadana VP, Datt S and Bajpai GC. 2008. Genetic Variability and Character Association in Interspecific Crosses of Pigeon pea. Environmental Ecology 26: 1138-40.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-04

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Genetic divergence and character association in Indo-African derivatives of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. (2025). Journal of Food Legumes, 24(3), 198-201. https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v24i3.1267