Morphological characterization of Indian pea varieties

Authors

  • G.P. DIXIT Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur -208 024, Uttar Pradesh, India Author
  • P.K. KATIYAR Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur -208 024, Uttar Pradesh, India Author
  • B.B. SINGH Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur -208 024, Uttar Pradesh, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v23i1.1440

Keywords:

Characterization, Cultivars, Pea, Pisum sativum L.

Abstract

A total of 43 released Indian cultivars of pea (Pisum sativum L.) were grouped for several agro morphological descriptors. Most of the varieties belong to the category of large seed weight. ‘VL 3’, ‘Azad P 2’, ‘HUP 2’ and ‘JM 6’were of medium seed weight category whereas ‘B 22’ was in small seed weight group. Varieties were also classified on the basis of foliage colour. Three types of foliage colour, viz., light-green, green and darkgreen were observed in the varieties but most of them belonged to either green or dark green group except ‘Azad P 2’, ‘HUP 2’, and ‘IPF 99-25’ which depicted light green foliage colour. The pea varieties were largely of early to medium flowering except ‘DDR 23’, ‘DDR 27’, ‘Arkel’, ‘Azad P 3’, ‘Azad P 31’, ‘Ageta 6’, ‘VRP 5’, ‘VRP 6’, ‘VRP 22’, ‘B 22’, and ‘VL 42’ which belonged to extra early flowering category. In most of the varieties, leaflet was present except ‘HUDP 15’, ‘HFP 4’, ‘HFP 8909’, ‘KPMR 522’, ‘KPMR 144-1’, ‘KPMR 400’, ‘Jayanti’, ‘DDR 48’, ‘HUP 2’ and ‘Swati’. Considerable variability was observed in plant height. Most of the varieties were of short or long plant height except ‘IPFD 1-10’, ‘VL 3’, ‘LFP 48’, ‘DDR 23’, ‘DDR 48’, ‘Azad P 3’, ‘Azad P 31’, ‘VRP 7’ and ‘VRPMR 9’ which belonged to medium group category. Seed surface was smooth in most of the varieties except ‘Arkel’, ‘Azad P 1’, ‘Azad P 3’, ‘Azad P 31’, ‘Ageta 6’, ‘VRP 6’, ‘VRP 7’, ‘VRP 22’, ‘Azad P 2’, ‘Azad P 5’, ‘VRPMR 9’ and ‘Azad P 4’ with wrinkled seeds.

References

Hedley CL and Ambrose MJ. 1981. Designing “leafless” plants for improving yields of dried pea crop. Advances in Agronomy 34: 225 – 227.

PPV & FR. 2001. Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmer’s Right Act (No.53 of 2001). Dept. of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi.

Sharma, B and Khan TN. 1996. Creating higher genetic yield potential in Fieldpea (Pisum sativum L.). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 56: 371 – 388.

Singh BB, Dixit GP, and Katiyar PK 2006. National test guidelines for distinctness, uniformity and stability of Pea. Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur.

Singh DP 1997. Tailoring the plant type in pulse crop. Plant Breeding Abstract 67: 1213 – 1220.

Snoad B, Fruscinate L and Monti LM 1985. The effects of three Genes which modify leaves and stipules in the pea plant. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 70: 322 – 329.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Morphological characterization of Indian pea varieties. (2025). Journal of Food Legumes, 23(1), 25-29. https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v23i1.1440