Chemical composition of 20 Brazilian desi and kabuli chickpea genotypes: the contributions of type and seed coats to antioxidant properties

Authors

  • Juliana Alves Diniz ProtHea–Research Group on Proteins for Health Promotion, Federal University of Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil Author
  • SaraAparecida Mendes Diniz Antonio Faculty of Nutrition, Federal University of Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Author
  • Ana Carolina Batista da Silva Lemos Faculty of Nutrition, Federal University of Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Author
  • Rayane Aparecida Vieira de Paula Faculty of Nutrition, Federal University of Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Author
  • Andiara Resende de Carvalho Faculty of Nutrition, Federal University of Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Author
  • Bruno Moreira Siqueira Graduate Program in Nutrition and Longevity-PPGNL, Federal University of Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil Author
  • Sinézio Inácio da Silva Júnior Food and Medicines Department, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil Author
  • Olga Luisa Tavano ProtHea–Research Group on Proteins for Health Promotion, Federal University of Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53550/jfl.v38.i2.266

Keywords:

Cicer arietinum, Pulses, Legumes, Total phenolics, Flavonoids, Seed coat

Abstract

This study analysed twenty Brazilian desi and kabuli chickpea cultivars for moisture, ash, lipid, protein, trypsin inhibition, and total phenolic and flavonoid content. Antioxidant activity was assessed using ABTS+ and DPPH assays. Desi chickpea seed coats, which are darker in color, correlated with higher phenolic and flavonoid contents, resulting in greater antioxidant activity. No clear differences in moisture, lipid, protein, ash, or trypsin inhibition were found between the desi and kabuli types. The chickpeas exhibited 8.08–9.05% moisture, 2.16–3.10% ash, 4.52–6.78% lipids, 16.69–23.78% protein, and 58.27–63.48% carbohydrates. All samples showed potential as protein sources. Consuming chickpeas with seed coats, particularly desi varieties, may offer enhanced antioxidant benefits. This highlights the healthpromoting potential of incorporating seed coats into food preparations. Additionally, the study underscores the potential of these Brazilian cultivars as sustainable, nutrient-dense sources with bioactive compounds.

References

AOAC. 1995. Official methods of analysis (8th ed.). Virginia, USA. Begum N, Khan QU, Liu LG, Li W, Liu D and Haq IU. 2023. Nutritional composition, health benefits and bio-active compounds of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Frontiers in Nutrition 10: 1218468.

Boateng J, Verghese M, Walker LT and Ogutu S. 2008. Effect of processing on antioxidant contents in selected dry beans (Phaseolus spp. L.). LWT - Food Science and Technology 41(9): 1541-1547.

Bochenek H, Francis N, Santhakumar AB, Blanchard CL and Chinkwo KA. 2023. The antioxidant and anticancer properties of chickpea water and chickpea polyphenol extracts in vitro. Cereal Chemistry 100(4): 895-903.

Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME and Berset CLWT. 1995. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT - Food Science and Technology 28(1): 25-30.

Brun P, Camacho M, Perea F, Rubio MJ and Rodríguez- Navarro DN. 2024. Characterization of Spanish chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.): Proximate, mineral, and phenolic compounds composition. European Food Research and Technology 250(4): 1007-1016.

Cid-Gallegos MS, Corzo-Ríos LJ, Jiménez-Martínez C and Sánchez-Chino XM. 2022. Protease inhibitors from plants as therapeutic agents: A review. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 77(1): 20-29.

Doma KM, Farrell EL, Leith-Bailey ER, Soucier VD and Duncan AM. 2019. Motivators, barriers and other factors related to bean consumption in older adults. Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics 38(4): 397-413.

Fadnes LT, Økland JM, Haaland ØA and Johansson KA. 2022. Estimating impact of food choices on life expectancy: A modeling study. PLoS Medicine 19(2): e1003889.

Faridy JCM, Martínez SCG, Méndez-Orellana GM and Montoya CJ. 2020. Biological activities of chickpea in human health (Cicer arietinum L.): A review. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 75: 142-153.

Fleming SE. 1981. A study of relationships between flatus potential and carbohydrate distribution in legume seeds. Journal of Food Science 46(3): 794-798.

Guillamón E, Pedrosa MM, Burbano C, Cuadrado C, Sánchez MC and Muzquiz M. 2008. The trypsin inhibitors present in seed of different grain legume species and cultivars. Food Chemistry 107(1): 68-74.

Hawtin GC and Singh KB. 1979. Kabuli-desi introgression: Problems and prospects. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Chickpea Improvement 28: 51-60.

Husain A, Chanana H, Khan SA, Dhanalekshmi UM, Ali M, Alghamdi AA and Ahmad A. 2022. Chemistry and pharmacological actions of delphinidin, a dietary purple pigment in anthocyanidin and anthocyanin forms. Frontiers in Nutrition 9: 746881.

JASP Team. 2023. JASP (Version 0.19.1) [Computer software]. JASP. Kakade ML, Rackis JJ, McGhee JE and Puski G. 1974. Determination of trypsin inhibitor activity of soy products: A collaborative analysis of an improved procedure. American Association of Cereal Chemists 51: 376-382.

Kaur R and Prasad K. 2021. Technological, processing and nutritional aspects of chickpea (Cicer arietinum): A review. Trends in Food Science and Technology 109: 448–463.

Mathew SE, Sumi MS and Shakappa D. 2024. Comparative nutritional analysis of improved and local chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cultivars. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 79: 539–544,.

Matsumoto H, Inaba H, Kishi M, Tominaga S, Hirayama M and Tsuda T. 2001. Orally administered delphinidin 3-rutinoside and cyanidin 3-rutinoside are directly absorbed in rats and humans and appear in the blood as the intact forms. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 49(3): 1546–1551.

Noda Y, Kaneyuki T, Mori A and Packer L. 2002. Antioxidant activities of pomegranate fruit extract and its anthocyanidins: Delphinidin, cyanidin, and pelargonidin. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50(1): 166–171.

Pal L, Dwivedi V, Gupta SK, Saxena S, Pandey A and Chattopadhyay D. 2023. Biochemical analysis of anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin and their regulation in determining chickpea flower and seed coat colour. Journal of Experimental Botany 74: 130–148.

Segev A, Badani H, Kapulnik Y, Shomer I, Oren‐Shamir M and Galili S. 2010. Determination of polyphenols, flavonoids, and antioxidant capacity in colored chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Food Science 75(2): S115–S119.

Shalaby ES and Shanab SMM. 2013. Comparison of DPPH and ABTS assays for determining antioxidant potential of water and methanol extracts of Spirulina patensis. Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences 42(5): 556–564.

Singleton VL and Rossi JA. 1965. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagent. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 16: 144–158.

Sreerama YN, Neelam DA, Sashikala VB and Pratape VM. 2010. Distribution of nutrients and antinutrients in milled fractions of chickpea and horse gram: Seed coat phenolics and their distinct modes of enzyme inhibition. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 58(7): 4322–4330.

Yanni AE, Iakovidi S, Vasilikopoulou E and Karathanos VT. 2023. Legumes: A vehicle for transition to sustainability. Nutrients 16(1): 98.

Zargarzadeh N, Mousavi SM, Santos HO, Aune D, Hasani-Ranjbar S, Larijani B and Esmaillzadeh A. 2023. Legume consumption and risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality: A systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Advances in Nutrition 14(1): 64–76.

Zhong L, Fang Z, Wahlqvist ML, Wu G, Hodgson JM and Johnson SK. 2018. Seed coats of pulses as a food ingredient: Characterization, processing, and applications. Trends in Food Science and Technology 80: 35–42.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-22

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Chemical composition of 20 Brazilian desi and kabuli chickpea genotypes: the contributions of type and seed coats to antioxidant properties. (2025). Journal of Food Legumes, 38(2), 246-254. https://doi.org/10.53550/jfl.v38.i2.266