Root research for drought tolerance in legumes: Quo vadis?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53550/jfl.v21i2.1963Abstract
Improving crop productivity under conditions of abiotic constraints in field is one of the major concerns in many areas of the world where legumes are grown. The legumes are generally grown under water-limiting conditions and as a result, these crops often encounter drought situation that reduces productivity to a large extent. Among many factors that are associated with drought tolerance in legume crops, root traits have been considered to be the most important attributes enabling the plant to mine water efficiently from deeper soil layer under dry environments. Most of the methods used to evaluate roots are time consuming, that provide valuable information about the root morphology but they do not reflect the dynamic characteristics of roots and root systems. Considerable amount of genetic variability with respect to root traits involving length, dry weight, root length density (RLD), etc., has been observed. Apart from the observed morphological variation in roots which has specific significance of adaptation, their functional aspects involving direct water uptake and their related kinetics are equally important. A large lysimetric system has been developed at ICRISAT to make progress in this direction. Compared to other legumes, root traits in chickpea has been thoroughly investigated and consequently, preliminary breeding works have been initiated using root traits. Root measurements in plants grown in cylinders showed almost similar relationship with depth and RLD determined in the field and thus have been used to explore diversity for these traits in chickpea. The possible diversity for root traits has been analyzed in wild relatives and transgenics as well. Using this method, root depth and RLD are being phenotyped in several recombinant inbred lines (RIL) populations. A major putative QTL for RLD was identified in a population involving a profuse rooting parent ICC 4958 and the contrasting Annigeri. These QTLs will be a faster and easier replacement technique against time-consuming phenotyping of roots and will be the way forward to introgress superior root characteristics. Efforts are also being made to use wild relatives of Cicer for inheriting some adaptive traits. In chickpea, preliminary work is being carried out to test the response to drought stress of DREBIA and P5CSF transgenic events using a lysimetric system. The work demonstrated a modest increase in water uptake but not yield under water stress in one transgenic event of DREBIA and one P5CSF event. In groundnut, DREBIA triggers native genes that might be involved in root development. In this review, the progress made so far on roots in legume crops has been elucidated which might explore possibilities of breeding genotypes to inherit efficient root system in legumes
References
Allen LH Jr., Boote KJ and Hammond LC. 1976. Peanut stomatal diffusive resistance affected by soil water and solar radiation. Proceedings of Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida 35: 42-46.
Amato M and Ritchie JT. 2002. Spatial distribution of roots and water uptake of maize (Zea mays L.) as affected by soil structure. Crop Science 42: 773-780.
Araujo AP, Antunes IF and Teixeira MG. 2005. Inheritance of root traits and phosphorus uptake in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under limited soil phosphorus supply. Euphytica 145: 33-50. Arihara J. Ac N and Okada K. 1991. Root Development of Pigeonpea and Chickpea and its Significance in Different Cropping Systems. In: ICRISAT Conference Paper no. CP 676. ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics). 1991. Phosphorus nutrition of grain legumes in the semi-arid tropics (Johansen C, Lee KK, and Sahrawat KL eds.), Patancheru, A.P. 502 324, India: ICRISAT.
Bidinger FR and Hash CT. 2004. Pearl millet. In: H.T. Nguyen and A. Blum (ed.) Physiology and biotechnology integration for plant breeding. Marcel Dekker, New York. Pp. 225-270.
Blum A, Jordan WR and Arkin GF. 1977. Sorghum root morphogenesis and growth. II. Manifestation of heterosis. Crop Science 17: 149- 153.
Boote KJ, Stansell JR. Schubert AM and Stone JF. 1982. Irrigation, water use, and water relations. In: HE Pattee and CT Young (eds.). Peanut Science and Technology. American Peanut Research Education Society, Yoakum, TX. Pp 164-205.
Boyer JS and Westgate ME. 2004. Grain yields with limited water. Journal of Experimental Botany 55: 2385-2394.
Chandra S, Buhariwalla HK, Kashiwagi J, Harikrishna S. Rupa Sridevi K, Krishnamurthy L, Serraj R and Crouch JH. 2004. Identifying QTL. linked markers in marker-deficient crops. In: Fischer T et al.(eds.). New directions for a diverse planet: Proceedings for the 4th International Crop Science Congress, Brisbane, Australia, 26 September 1 October 2004.
Dardanelli JL, Bachmeier OA, Sereno R and Gil R. 1997. Rooting depth and soil water extraction patterns of different crops in a silty loam Haplustoll. Field Crops Research 54: 29-38.
Gregory PJ, McGowan M, Biscoc PV and Hunter B. 1978 relations of winter wheat. 1. Growth of the root system. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge) 91:91-102.
Hamblin AP and Tennant D. 1987. Root length density and water uptake in cereals and grain legumes: how well are they correlated? Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 38: 513-527. Johansen C, Singh DN, Krishnamurthy L. Saxena NP. Chauhan Y'S and Rao KJVDK. 1997. Options for alleviating moisture stress in pulsc crops. In: A.N. Asthana and Massod Ali (eds). Recent Advances in Pulses Research. Indian Society of Pulses Research and Development, IIPR, Kanpur, India. Pp 425-442.
Jones JW and Zur B. 1984. Simulation of possible adaptive mechanisms in crops subjected to water stress. Irrigation Science 5: 251-264. Jordan WR. Dugas Jr. WA and Shouse. 1983. Strategies for crop improvement for drought-prone regions. Agricultural Water Management 7: 281-289.
Kashiwagi J. Krishnamurthy L, Crouch JH and Serraj R. 2006. Variability of root length density and its contributions to seed yield in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under terminal drought stress. Field Crops Research 95: 171-181.
Kashiwagi J, Krishnamurthy L, Gaur PM, Chandra S and Upadhyaya HD. 2007. Estimation of gene effects of the drought avoidance root characteristics in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Field Crops Research (In Press) doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.07.007.
Kashiwagi J, Krishnamurthy L, Upadhyaya HD, Krishna H, Chandra S. Vadez V and Serraj R. 2005. Genetic variability of drought- avoidance root traits in the mini-corc germplasm collection of chickpea (Cicer arietmum L.). Euphytica 146: 213–222.
Katayama K, Ito O, Adu-gyamfi JJ and Rao TP. 2000. Analysis of relationship between root length density and water uptake by roots of five crops using Minirhizotron in the semi- arid tropics. Reprinted from JARQ Vol. 34, No. 2.
Ketring DL and Reid JL. 1993. Growth of peanut roots under field conditions. Agronomy Journal 85: 80-85.
Ketring DL, Jordan WR, Smith OD and Simpson CE. 1982. Genetic variability in root and shoot growth characteristics of peanut. Peanut Science 9: 68-72.
Krishnamurthy L, Johansen C and Sethi SC. 1999. Investigation of factors determining genotypic differences in seed yield of non- irrigated and irrigated chickpeas using a physiological model of yield determination. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 183. 9-17.
Krishnamurthy L. Kashiwagi JW, Upadhyaya HD, and Serraj R. 2003. Genetic diversity of drought-avoidance root traits in the Mini- Core germplasm collection of chickpea (Cicer spp.). International Chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsletter 10: 21-24.
Krishnamurthy L, Serraj R, Kashiwagi J, Panwar JDS, Rao YK and Kumar J. 2004. Multilocation analysis of yield and yield components of a chickpea mapping population grown under terminal drought. Indian Journal of Pulses Research 17:17-24.
Lafolie F, Bruckier L and Tardieu F. 1991. Modeling root water potential and soil-root water transport. 1. Model presentation. Soil Science Society of America Journal 55: 1203-1212.
Lenka D. and Misra, PK 1973. Response of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to irrigation. Indian Journal of Agronomy 18:492-497
Ludlow MM and Muchow RC. 1990. A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Advances in Agronomy 43: 107-153.
Masle J, Gilmore SR and Farquhar GD. 2005. The ERECTA gene regulates plant transpiration efficiency in arabidopsis. Nature 436: 866-870.
McIntyre BD, Riha SJ and Flower DJ. 1995. Water Uptake by pearl millet in a semi-arid environment. Field Crops Rescarch 43: 67- 76.
Meisner CA and Karnok KJ. 1992. Peanut root response to drought stress. Agronomy Journal 84: 159-165.
Miller EC. 1916. Comparative study of root systems and leaf areas of corn and sorghum. Journal of Agricultural Research 6: 311-332.
Monteith JL. 1986. How do crops manipulate supply and demand? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A316: 245-259.
O'Toole JC and Bland WL.1987. Genotypic variation in crop plant root systems. Advances in Agronomy 41: 91-145.
Pandey RK, Herrera WAT, Villegas AN and Pendleton JW. 1984. Drought response of grain legumes under irrigation gradient: III. Plant growth. Agronomy Journal 76: 549-553.
Park S, LiJ, Pittman JK, Berkowitz GA, Yang H, Undurraga S, Morris J, Hirschi KD and Gaxiola RA. 2005. Up-regulation of a H*. pyrophosphatase (H-PPase) as a strategy to engineer drought- resistant crop plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 18830-18835. Passioura JB. 1983. Roots and drought resistance. Agricultural Water Management 7:265-280.
Robertson WK, Hammond LC, Johnson JT and Boote KJ. 1980. Effects of plant-water stress on root distribution of corn, soybeans and peanuts in sandy soil. Agronomy Journal 72: 548-550.
Saxena NP. 1984. Chickpea. The Physiology. Tropical Field Crops. Pp 419-452.
Serraj R, Krishnamurthy L. Kashiwagi J, Kumar J. Chandra S and Crouch JH. 2004. Variation in root traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) grown under terminal drought. Field Crops Research. 88: 115–127. Sharp RE and Davies WJ. 1985. Root growth and water uptake by maize plants in drying soil. Journal of Experimental Botany 36: 1441-1456.
Sinclair TR and Muchow CR. 2001. System analysis of plant traits to increase grain yield on limited water supplies. Agronomy Journal 93: 263-270.
Sinclair TR, Hammer GL and van Oosterom EJ. 2005. Potential yield and water-use efficiency benefits in sorghum from limited maximum transpiration rate. Functional Plant Biology 32: 945-952.
Sinclair TR, Zwieniecki MA and Michele Hobrook N. 2008. Low leaf hydraulic conductance associated with drought tolerance in soybean. Physiologia Plantarum 132: 446-451.
Singh KB, Ocampo B and Robertson LD. 1998, Diversity of biotic and abiotic stress resistance in the wild annual Cicer species. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 45: 9-17.
Squire GR. 1979. The response of stomata of pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides S. and H.) to atmospheric humidity. Journal of Experimental Botany 30: 925-933.
Toker C, Canci H. and Yildirim T. 2007. Evaluation of perennial wild Cicer specics for drought resistance. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 54:1781-1786.
Upadhyaya HD and Nigam SN. 1998. Epistasis for vegetative and reproductive traits in peanut. Crop Science 38: 44–49.
Vadez V, Rao S, Sharma KK, Bhatnagar Mathur P and Devi JM. 2007a. Drebia allows for more water uptake in groundnut by a large modification in the root/shoot ratio under water deficit. International Arachis Newsletter 27: 27-31.
Vadez V, Krishnamurthy L, Kashiwagi JW, Kholova J, Devi JM, Sharma KK, Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Hoisington DA, Hash CT, Bidinger FR, and Keatinge JDH. 2007b. Exploiting the functionality of root systems for dry, saline, and nutrient deficient environments in a changing climate. J. SAT Agric Res Volume 4 (Special Symposium edition). http://www.icrisat.org/journal/specialproject.htm.
