Growth pattern and its impact on seed yield in cultivated and wild genotypes of Vigna
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53550/jfl.v19i2.2228Keywords:
Growth analysis, Mungbean, Urdbean, Vigna radiata var sublobata, V radiata var setulosaAbstract
Eight genotypes belonging to cultivated and wild types under genus Vigna showed significant differences for total dry matter content, plant height, number of leaves/plant, CGR, RGR and leaf-RGR at flowering and active pod filling stages but not in early vegetative or pre-flowering stages. Urdbean cultivar LU 487 accumulated maximum amount of dry matter at 60 DAS and wild accession Sub 17, the lowest amount. In genotypes having high dry matter content, the partitioning of biomass towards sink was a limiting factor for determination of yield, while for low dry matter accumulators, the whole plant dry matter content was the main determinant. Among all the genotypes, Sub 14 and Set 3 were found to be the highest yielders. CGR attained the peak value between 45 and 60 DAS. The maximum RGR value was achieved during 30-45 DAS and it mostly coincided with that of leaf-RGR. Leaf nitrogen and chlorophyll content followed sigmoidal pattern of changes. High photosynthetic activity at post-anthesis period coupled with effective remobilization of nitrogen reserves were found to be important criteria for ensuring high yield in these genotypes.
References
Arnon, D.I. 1949. Copper enzyme in isolated chloroplast polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology 24: 1-15.
Bhattacharya, A. 1996. Influence of dry matter allocation and their rates during pre- and post-flowering phases in various plant parts on mungbean seed yield. Legume Research 19: 179-184.
Bushby, H.V.A. and Lawn, R.J. 1992. Accumulation and partitioning of nitrogen and dry matter by contrasting genotypes of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43: 1609-1628.
Chowdhury, M.M.U., Ullah, M.H. and Mahmmud, Z.U. 2000. Dry matter production in mungbean [Vignu radiata (L.) Wilczek] as influenced by Bradyrhizobium inoculation and phosphorus application. Legume Research 23: 15-20.
Egli, D.B., Guffy. R.D. and Leggett, J.E. 1985. Partitioning of assimilate between vegetative and reproductive growth in soybean. Agronomy Journal 77: 917-922.
Francisco, P.B.Jr. and Macda, K. 1989. Agro-physiological studies on the yield performance of mungbean. II. Cultivar differences in dry matter production, partitioning and yield components and their relationships with carliness in flowering. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 58: 702-710.
Jackson, M.L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
Min, X.Z. and Hc. G.O. 1991. Studies of the source-sink relationship during pod filling in soybean. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences 7: 13-19.
Growth pattern in
Pandey, A.K. and Singh, S.P. 2000. relation to yield in mungbean. [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczck]. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 60: 237-238. Pandey, R.K., Saxena, M.C. and Singh, V.B. 1978. Growth analysis of blackgram genotypes. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 48: 466-473.
Prasad, S., Srivastava, J.P. and Prasad. S. 1999. Physiological analysis of yielding ability in mungbean. Indian Journal of Pulses Research 12: 49-56.
Watson, D.J. 1952. The physiological basis of variation in yield. Advances in Agronomy 4: 101-145.




