Comparison of biparental mating and selfing series for yield improvement in mungbean
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53550/jfl.v19i1.2271Keywords:
Biparental mating, Genetic parameters, Mungbean, Selfing series, Single pod descent, Vigna radiataAbstract
The F, generation of a single cross, China mung x TM 98-50, of mungbean was advanced to F, generation following biparental mating (BIP), single pod descent (SPD), bulk and single plant selection (SPS) methods. The biparental progenies exhibited higher mean performance with higher upper limits of the range in the desired direction for all the characters except plant height. High degree of genetic variation was exhibited by BIP progenies as compared to other progenies for most of the characters except plant height and pod length. The biparental progenies proved superior to SPD, bulk and SPS progenies in producing higher frequency of transgressive segregants. The utility of biparental mating in early segregating generations is emphasized in mungbean.
References
Burton, G.W. and Devanc, E.M. 1953. Estimating heritability in tall fescue (Festuca cirnelinaceae) from replicated clonal material. Agronomy Journal 45: 479-481.
Dahiya, B.N. and Singh, V.P. 1986. Comparison of single seed descent, selective intermaling and mass selection for seed size in greengram. Theoretical Applied Genetics 72: 678-681.
Dahiya, B.N. and Singh, V.P. 1991. Variability among progenics of greengram developed through five selection methods. Indian Journal of Pulses Research 4: 5-8.
Gill, K.S., Bains, S.S., Singh, G. and Bains, K.S. 1973. Partial diallel test crossing for yield and its components in Triticum aestivum L. Proceedings of Fourth International Wheat Genetics Symposium, Missouri, Columbia, pp. 29-33.
Singh, G., Bhullar, G.S. and Gill, K.S. 1986. Comparison of variability generated following biparental mating and sclfing in wheat. Crop Improvement 13: 24-28.
Hanson, G.H.. Robinson, H.F. and Comstock, R.E. 1956. Biometrical studies of yield in segregating populations of Koren hespedeza. Agronomy Journal 48: 267-282.
Nagaraj, K., Salimath, P.M. and Kajjidoni, S.T. 2002. Transgressive segregants in populations derived form different mating and selection schemes in chickpea. Crop Research 23: 95 - 98.
Nanda, G.S., Singh, G. and Gill, K.S. 1990. Efficiency of intermating in F, generation of an intervarietal cross in bread wheat. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 50: 364- 368.
Nematullah and Jha, P.B. 1993. Effect of biparental mating in wheat. Crop Improvement 20: 173 - 178.
Parameshwarappa, K.G., Kulkauri, M.S., Gulaganji, G.G., Kubsad, V.S. and Mallapur, C.P. 1997. An assessment of genetic variability created through biparental mating in safflower. Fifth International Safflower Conference, Bari (Italy), 2-7 June, 1997, pp. 238-239.
Robinson. H.F., Comstock, R.E. and Harvey, P.H. 1949. Estimates of heritability and degree of dominance in corn. Agronomy Journal 41: 353-359.
Yunus, M. and Paroda, R.S. 1983. Extent of genetic variability created through biparental mating in wheat. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 43: 76-81.
