Induced mutagenesis for resistance to mungbean yellow mosaic virus and yield traits in mungbean

Authors

  • Deepthі ЅT Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, UAS, Dharwad – 580 005, Karnataka, India. Author
  • Ѕumangala Bhat Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, UAS, Dharwad – 580 005, Karnataka, India. Author
  • Suma C Mogali Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, UAS, Dharwad – 580 005, Karnataka, India. Author
  • PR Saabale ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Regional Research Station, UAS, Dharwad- 580 005, Karnataka, India. Author
  • Kiranakumar DM Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture, UAS, Dharwad – 580 005, Karnataka, India. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v37.i2.189

Keywords:

Mungbean, EMS, MYMV, Mutants

Abstract

The M0 ѕeedѕ of mungbean variety DGGV 2 treated with different doѕeѕ of ethyl methane ѕulphonate (EMЅ) at 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3% concentrations were assessed for Mungbean Yellow Mosaic Virus (MYMV) in M2 generation during summer 2023 at University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad. Considering the yield superiority over check (Mean + 2 Standard Deviation) and highly resistant response to MYMV disease, out of 962 M2 plants 17 superior M2 plants were identified. The seed yield plant-1 in these identified mutants ranged from 21.9 to 32.0 g which is higher compared to the average yield of check DGGV 2 (11.7 g) during that season. Also, the other yield contributing traits such as number of productive branches, number of cluster plant-1, number of pods cluster-1, and number of pods plant-1 were observed to be higher in these mutants in comparison to check variety.

References

Ali M and Gupta S. 2012. Carrying capacity of Indian agriculture: pulse crops. Current Science 102(6): 874-881.

Amin R, Laskar RA and Khan S. 2015. Assessment of genetic response and character association for yield and yield components in Lentil (Lens culinaris L.) population developed through chemical mutagenesis. Cogent Food & Agriculture 1(1): 1000715.

Auti SG. 2012. Induced morphological and quantitative mutations in mungbean. Bioremediation, Biodiversity and Bioavailability 6(1): 27-39.

Das TR and Baisakh B. 2018. Mutation-induced polygenic variability and early prediction of high yielding mutants in greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Allied Sciences 7(1): 3228-3236.

Kencharaddi HG, Patil RS, Mohan NB, Praveenkumar B, Kumar KY and Chowkimath A. 2013. Identification of superior segregants in early segregating generations of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Archives 13(1): 45-49.

Kumar R, Sharma NK, Meena S and Balakrishnan AP. 2021. Mutation breeding: a way forward for genetic improvement in mungbean. International Journal of Plant and Environment 7(4): 255-262.

Kumar S, Gopinath KA, Sheoran S, Meena RS, Srinivasarao C, Bedwal S, Jangir CK, Mrunalini K, Jat RD and Praharaj CS. 2023. Pulse-based cropping systems for soil health restoration resources conservation and nutritional and environmental security in rainfed agroecosystems. Frontiers in Microbiology 13: 1041124.

Laskar RA, Wani MR, Raina A, Amin R and Khan S. 2018. Morphological characterisation of gamma rays induced multi podding mutant (mp) in lentil cultivar Pant L 406. International Journal of Radiation Biology 94: 1049-1053.

Oladosu Y, Rafii MY, Abdullah N, Hussin G, Ramli A, Rahim HA, Miah G and Usman M. 2016. Principle and application of plant mutagenesis in crop improvement: a review. Biotechnology and Biotechnology Equipment 30(1): 1-16.

Raina A, Laskar RA, Khursheed S, Amin R, Tantray YR, Parveen K and Khan S. 2019. Role of mutation breeding in crop improvement-past present and future. Asian Research Journal of Agriculture 19: 1–3.

Ramya B, Nallathambi G and Ram SG. 2014. The effect of mutagens on M1 population of black gram (Vigno mungo L. Heer). African Journal of Biotechnology 13(8): 951-956.

Senapati N, Misra RC and Muduli KC. 2008. Induced macromutation in blackgram [Vigna mungo (L.) Heer]. Legume Research-An International Journal 31(4): 243-248.

Tickoo JL and Chandra N. 1999. Mutagen inducedpolygenic variability in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 59(02): 193-201.

Wani MR, Dar AR, Tak A, Amin I, Shah NH, Rehman R, Baba M., Raina A, Laskar R, Kozgar MI and Khan S. 2017. Chemo-induced pod and seed mutants in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). SAARC Journal of Agriculture 15: 57-67.

Wani MR. 2021. Comparative biological sensitivity and mutability of chemo mutagens in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). Legume Research 44(1): 26-30.

Wongpiyasatid A, Chotechuen S and Hormchan P. 2000. Induced mutations in mungbean breeding regional yield trail of mungbean mutant lines. Kasetsart Journal (Nature Science) 34: 443-449.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Induced mutagenesis for resistance to mungbean yellow mosaic virus and yield traits in mungbean. (2024). Journal of Food Legumes, 37(2), 163-166. https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v37.i2.189