Cultural and morphological variability of Rhizoctonia solani causing web blight of mungbean in Jharkhand state of India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/journaloffoodlegumes.v31i4.411Keywords:
Cultural, Morphological, Mungbean, Rhizoctonia solani, VariabilityAbstract
Web blight of mungbean is one of the major diseases which incur huge loss and holds back the mung bean production. A comprehensive study was made during Kharif 2012 on the characterization of R. solani on the basis of morphology, virulence, reaction of pathogen on differential host and eco friendly management of the disease. The surveillance made revealed that the blight of mung bean was prevalent in all the places visited. The disease incidence varied from 33.10 per cent to 53.10 per cent in different localities. The pathogen R. solani was isolated from infected plants obtained from different locations and designated as RS 1 to RS 9. In the morphological study, all the isolates of R. solani shared typical characters like right angle branching near the distal septum of the young vegetative hyphe, formation of dolipore septum, no clamp connection and no conidium except moniliod cells. All the nine isolates grown on PDA showed differences in mycelial growth. RS 8 isolate showed highest growth rate after 72 hours of observation. Among nine isolates, five exhibited aerial growth of their colonies, four isolates RS 4, RS6, RS 7 and RS 9 produced sub-aerial colonies. The colony colours of RS 2, RS 6 and RS 8 isolates were brown while that of isolates RS 3, RS 5, RS 7 and Rs 9 were white. RS 1, RS 2, RS 3, RS 5, RS 6 and RS 8 isolates grew fast as well as RS 4, RS7, RS 9 grew moderately. Morphological studies of R.solani on four solid and liquid broth medium was taken PDA is the best solid medium for R. solani followed by Czapek’s medium while in case of Czapek’s broth is best for growth of R. solani. Sclerotial charcters indicated that in 3 isolates sclerotia were located on surface of colony, subsurface location of sclerotia was observed in RS 6 and RS 9 isolates and in RS 1, RS 3, Rs 4, RS 7 sclerotia were embedded inside medium. Sclerotial size was invariably macro except RS 2, RS 6 and RS 9. The maximum sclerotia size 2.960 mm was observed in PDA medium.Out of 15 mungbean varieties, one HUM-1 showed resistant reaction, one PDM 54 showed moderately resistant reaction, six variety showed susceptible reaction and seven variety showed highly susceptible reaction.
References
Azam MF and Khan MW. 1973. Cultural and nutritional studies of cauliflower isolate of Rhizoctonia solani. Indian Phytophath. 26: 447-445
Bateman DF. 1962. Relation of soil pH to development of poinsettia root rots. Phytopathology. 52: 559-566
Dubey SC and Mishra B. 1995. Three new diseases on rice bean (Vigna umbellata). Journal Research 7: 75-78
Dubey SC, Tripathi A, Upadhyay BK and Singh B. 2012. Influence of weather and soil parameters on development of wet root rot in pulse crops and virulence analysis of Rhizoctonia solani isolates. Journal of Agricultural Science 4(11): 195-204
Dutta V, Gupta S, Kalha S, Kalha CS and Razdan VK. 2013. Morphocultural and pathogenic variability among isolates of Rhizoctonia solani causing Sheath Blight of Rice in Jummu. Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology 43(2): 210-215
Gokulapalan C, Nayar K and Uma Maheshwaran K. 2000. Foliar blight of Amaranthus caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology 30: 239-241
Gurav NP, Mehta N, Basavraj K and Singh S. 2017. Cultural, morphological variability and anastomosis behaviour in R. solani isolates causing sheath blight of rice. Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology 47(4): 382-393
Lal M, Kandhari J and Singh V. 2012. Characterization of virulence pattern in Rhizoctonia solani causing sheath blight of rice. Indian Physiopathology 65(1): 60-63
Lily VC and Barnett HL. 1951. Physiology of the fungi. Mc Graw Hill Book Co. Inc. New York. 463
Madhusadan T, Amin KS and Gopalraju D. 1977. Influence of carbon and nitrogen source on growth and sclerotia formation of the rice sheath blight pathogen. Mysore Journal of Agriculture Science 11: 544-547
Ogoshi A. 1996. The genus Rhizoctonia. In Rhizoctonia species: taxonomy, molecular biology, ecology, pathology and disease control. Eds. Sneh B, Jabaji-Hare S, Neate S, Dijst G, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherland.1-9pp.
Parmeter JR and Whitney HS. 1970. Taxonomy and nomenclature of the imperfect state: Rhizoctonia solani, Biology and Pathology. In: JR Parmeter (Jr.) (Ed.) Univ. of California, Press, Berkeley: 7-19
Rangaswami G and Mahadevan A. 2004. Diseases of crop plants in India (Eds). Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Limited Publisher, New Delhi, India. 507p.
Sharma R and Singh US. 2003. An improved in vitro inoculation method for Rhizoctonia causing sheath blight of rice. Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology 3: 315-316
Sunder S, Kataria HR, Satyavir and Sheoran OP. 2003. Characterization of Rhizoctonia solani associated with root/ collar rots and blights. Indian Phytopathology 56(1): 27-33
Tiwari Anamika and Khare MN. 1998. Variability among isolates of Rhizoctonia solani infecting mungbean. Indian Phytopathology 51(4): 334-337
Upmanyu Sachin, Gupta SK and Kaur R. 2005. Variation in French bean isolates of Rhizoctonia solani kuhn. Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology 35(1): 168-173




