Screening of resistant pigeonpea genotypes against pod infecting insects

Authors

  • ZADDA KAVITHA National Pulses Research Centre, Vamban, Pudukottai, Tamil Nadu Author
  • VIJAYARAGHAVAN Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tamil Nadu Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/journaloffoodlegumes.v31i4.415

Keywords:

Blue butterfly, Pigeonpea, Plume moth, Pod bug complex, Pod fly, Screening

Abstract

Pigeonpea is being attacked by several pod borers from the initiation of flowering to harvesting. During pod development and maturity, pod sucking bugs and pod fly cause much damage and in turn severe economic losses. Identification of tolerant or resistant cultivars to these insect pests is of utmost important. So, a three year screening study was conducted from 2013 to 2015 during which 145 nos. of pigeonpea germplasm were screened and entries which showed resistance to a particular insect in all the three years were identified as the resistant entries. For plume moth, twenty entries showed stable resistance levels during all the three years. Among them, ICPL 8719 and H 23 recorded minimum PSI of 1.7. Eight entries i.e., CORG 9900134, H 23, V 127, ICP 11293, ICP 49114, ICP 11957, SMR 1693158 and ICPL 8719 showed constant resistance levels to blue butterfly. Among them, minimum PSI of 1.3 was recorded in ICPL 8719. Four entries i.e., H 23, GR 28, ICP 49114 and SMR 1693158 were found to be resistant to pod bug complex. SMR 1693158 with the PSI of 2.7 was found to be promising among them. For pod fly, five entries were constantly resistant (PLS 476 A, V 127, BAHAR, ICP 8863 and WRG 157) among which V 127 recorded less PSI (1.7).

References

Dolling WR. 1973. A revision of the oriental pod bug of the tribe Clavigrallini (Hemiptera: Coreidae). Bull British Museum Entomology 36(6): 281-321.

Ghetiya LV and Mehta DM. 2014. Effect of morphological characters on susceptibility against blue butterfly, Lampides boeticus Linnaeus in pigeonpea. AGRES-An International e-Journal 3(4): 325-334

Lateef SS and Reed W. 1981. Survey of insect pest damage in farmer’s field in India. International chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsletter 1: 29-30.

Maneesh Kumar Singh, Ram Keval, Snehel Chakravarty and Vijay Kumar Mishra. 2017. Screening of pigeonpea genotypes against tur pod fly, Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch) in agro-ecosystem. International Journal Current Microbiology Applied Science 6(3): 1911-1917

Manzoor Hussain Dar, Parvez Qamar Rizvi and Arshad Ali. 2010. Response of pigeonpea podfly, Melanagromyza obtusa Malloch against different cultivars of pigeonpea. Academic Journal of Plant Sciences 3(2): 50-52.

Moudgal RK, Lakra RK and Dahiya B. 2009. Screening of pigeonpea for resistance against Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch). Indian Journal of Applied Entomology 23(2): 181-84.

Nene YL, Susan DH and Sheila VK. 1990. The Pigeonpea. C.A.B. International Wallingford for ICRISAT, Patancheru, India. Pp. 490.

Prasad D and Singh A. 2004. Advances in Plant Protection Sciences. Akansha Publishing House, New Delhi. Pp. 421.

Reed W, Lateef SS, Sithananthan S and Pawar CS. 1989. Pigeonpea and chickpea Insect Identification Handbook. Information Bulletin no. 26. International Crops Research

Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India. Pp. 120.

Veda OP. 1993. Effect of weather factors on the incidence of pod bug, Clavigralla gibbosa Spinola (Hemiptera: Coreidae) in pigeonpea. Indian Journal of Entomology 55(4): 351-354.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-03

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Screening of resistant pigeonpea genotypes against pod infecting insects. (2024). Journal of Food Legumes, 31(4), 234-240. https://doi.org/10.59797/journaloffoodlegumes.v31i4.415