Root anatomical parameters for identification of fusarium wilt resistant and susceptible lines of chickpea

Authors

  • DH SARNOBAT Plant Pathology Section, College of Agriculture, Pune 411005, Maharashtra, India Author
  • CD DEOKAR Plant Pathology Section, College of Agriculture, Pune 411005, Maharashtra, India Author
  • RS WAGH Plant Pathology Section, College of Agriculture, Pune 411005, Maharashtra, India; Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/journaloffoodlegumes.v30i4.470

Keywords:

Chickpea, Fusarium wilt, Rootmorphology, Vascularanatomy

Abstract

Morphological and vascular anatomical features of roots of fifteen days old plants of wilt susceptible chickpea genotypes were shredded.Resistant lines had comparatively fewer numbers of lateral roots as compared to susceptible lines. Microscopic observation of transverse section of tap root showed some correlation between resistant traits and vascular anatomy. Resistant lines showed a tendency of higher protoxylem and metaxylem number and total xylem vessels cross-section area. However, Some chickpea lines possessing less number of protoxylem and metaxylem showed susceptible response.The root anatomical parameters could differentiate the Fusarium wilt resistant and susceptible lines of chickpea with the help of scattered plot diagram.

References

Appel DJ and Gordon TR. 1996. Relationships among pathogenic and non-pathogenic isolates of Fusarium oxysporum based on the partial sequence of the intergenic spacer region of the ribosomal DNA. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions 9: 125-138.

Anonymous. 2008. Chickpea report, Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India.

Beckman CH. 1987. The Nature of Wilt Diseases of Plants. APS Press. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.

Booth C. 1971. The genus Fusarium. Common wealth Mycological Institute, Kew (Surrey), England. 137pp.

Chaudhary RG and Kumud K. 2000. Role of width of Xylem and root vascular bundles of pigeonpea in resistance to wilt. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 8: 102-104.

Deshmukh RB. 2005b. Advance in major pulse crops research-success stories. 4th International Food Legumes Research Conference - IV, October 18-22, 2005 at New Delhi, India, p-7.

Kraft JM, Haware MP, Jimenez-Diaz RM, Bayaa B and Harrab M. 1994. Screening techniques and sources of resistance to root rots and wilts in cool season food legumes. pp. 268-289.

Kotresh H, Fakrudin B, Punnuri SM, Raj kumar BK, Thudi M, Paramesh H, Lohithaswa H and Kuruvinashetti MS. 2006. Identification of two RAPD markers genetically linked to a recessive allele of a Fusarium wilt resistance gene in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.) Euphytica 149: 113-120.

Nene YL and Reddy MV. 1987. Chickpea disease and their control. Pages 233-270 in. The Chickpea (MC Saxena and KB Singh eds.) CAB International, Wallingford, U.K.

Okiror MA. 2002. Evaluation of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) germplasm for resistance to Fusarium wilt. Indian Journal Agricultural Sciences 69: 600-1.

Pandey RN, Pawar SE and Bhatia CR. 1997. Fusarium udum and wilt susceptible and resistant pigeonpea genotypes: fungal growth and histopathology. Indian Phytopath 50: 53-58.

Reddy PL, Bhasker BV, Rekha RK and Haranath NP. 2009. Molecular marker for screening fusarium wilt resistance in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh]. Legume Research 32: 19-24.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-07

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Root anatomical parameters for identification of fusarium wilt resistant and susceptible lines of chickpea. (2024). Journal of Food Legumes, 30(4), 285-288. https://doi.org/10.59797/journaloffoodlegumes.v30i4.470