Crop growth, productivity, water use and economics in mungbean and urdbean as influenced by precision tillage and sprinkler irrigation scheduling
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/journaloffoodlegumes.v29i2.524Keywords:
Economics, Grain yield, Mungbean, Precision tillage, Sprinkler irrigation, Urdbean, Water useAbstract
Our renewed emphasis has been towards selective yet sustainable intensification of viable cropping systems through inclusion of more efficient soil building crops such as puls es, and use of e ffic ient modern production technologies. Amongst pulses, mungbean and urdbean - the fast growing and remunerative pulses with low water requirement in comparison to most of the cereal/oilseeds crops - could be the candidate crops for this. As the crop matures in around two months, improved yet specific agrotechnologies viz., precision tillage and sprinkler based irrigation scheduling could enhance crop productivity and conserve resources. In this context, a field experiment was carried out under EGPZ at ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India for two years (2013 and 14) in a sandy loam soil (Typic Ustochrept) with neutral pH and low soil fertility with an objective of enhancing crop productivity per unit water use through precision tillage and sprinkler irrigation scheduling in pre-kharif mungbean and urdbean. The study showed that significant improvement in grain yield with water saving (with low crop water use and enhanced water use efficiency, WUE) was recorded in these crops grown under precision tillage carried out by laser leveler. Besides decreasing grain yield, conventional or normal tillage options alone resulted in at least 10.9% more water use and 30.2% less WUE in comparison to precision tillage in mungbean. Sprinkler irrigation given at pod initiation and seed setting stages was advantageous for enhancing efficiency in crop water use even in case of short duration crop of mungbean with 19.5% less water use and 19.1 % higher WUE over flood irrigation given at the above stages. In urdbean, precision tillage had an edge in realization of higher grain yield (11.3%) and total biomass at harvest (19.8%). Increases in productivity (and related growth and yield attributes) making the crop remunerative was also apparent because of consistent supply of water over an extended period of crop growth maintaining a constant yet higher plant water balance and rhizosperic soil moisture content through sprinkler irrigation coupled with laser leveling. Therefore, sprinkler irrigation could play a safe proposition in regulated or precision irrigation scheduling in respect to its quantum/time/frequency. The interactive effect of precision farming carried out through a synergy involving laser levelling and sprinkler irrigation scheduling was also evident in the study. Significant improvement in seed yield (69.2%) was recorded with sprinkler irrigation applied as and when required in mungbean when sowing of the crop was preceded with precision tillage in comparison to normal plough/plank alone. Thus, the present study infers the importance of improved irrigation agronomy in augmenting existing pulses production through growing short duration pre-kharif pulses (mungbean and urdbean) as the supplementary crops in existing cropping systems.
References
Anonymous 2016. Laser Leveling: Resource Conservation through Laser Leveling (www.dswcpunjab.gov.in/contents/Laser-Leveling.htm) cited on 14.10.2016.
ARNEH 2016.Annual Report on promotion of pulses in NEH region 2015-16, ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208 024 (India). 56pp.
DES 2016. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Deptt of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers’ welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Government of India.
Doorenbos J and Pruitt WO. 1997. Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 24, FAO,Rome.
Mishra JP, Praharaj CS and Singh KK. 2012a. Enhancing water use efficiency and production potential of chickpea and fieldpeathrough seed bed configurations and irrigation regimes in North Indian Plains. Journal of Food Legumes 25 (4): 310-313
Mishra JP, Praharaj CS and Singh KK and Kumar N. 2012b. Impact of conservation practices on crop water use and productivity inchickpea under middle Indo-Gangetic plains. Journal of Food Legumes 25 (1): 41-44.
Praharaj CS. 2014 Water management strategies for pulse based cropping systems.In: Resource Conservation Technology in Pulses (Eds., Ghosh et al. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur) pp.199-212.
Praharaj CS, Kumar Rajesh, Akram M, Jha UC, Singh Ummed, Narendra Kumar, Singh SS and Singh SK. 2015a. Dissemination of pulses production technologies for enhancing profitability of farmers in Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Food Legumes 28 (2): 157-61.
Praharaj CS, Singh Ummed and Hazra KK. 2014a.Technological interventions for strategic management of water for conserving natural resources. In: Proceeding of 6th World Congress on Conservation Agriculture - Soil Health And Wallet Wealth,
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, June 22-26, 2014, pp.3. Praharaj CS, Singh Ummed and Singh SS. 2014b. Raising a remunerative summer mungbean with micro-irrigation. Pulses Newsletter 25 (3):9.
Praharaj CS, Singh Ummed and Singh SS. 2015c. Up-scaling water productivity and sustainability through grain legumes. In: G.P. Dixit, Jagdish Singh and N.P. Singh (Eds) Pulses: Challenges and Opportunities under Changing Climatic Scenario. ISPRD, Kanpur, U.P., India, Pp. 180-198.
Praharaj CS, Singh Ummed and Singh SS and Kumar N. 2015b.Growing summer mungbean with less water. Pulses Newsletter 26(2):6.
Singh NP, Praharaj CS, Singh SS, Singh Ummed and Kumar N. 2016. Pulses production enhancement through summer mungbean. ICAR News 22 (2): 2-4.
Subramaniyan K, Subramanian E, Praharaj CS, Singh SS and Kumar N. 2015. Enhanacing RUE in rice-urdbean in Southern India.Pulses Newsletter 26 (1): 8.
Venkatesh MS, Hazra KK, Ghosh PK, Praharaj CS and Kumar N. 2013. Long-term effect of pulses and nutrient management on soil carbon sequestration in Indo-Gangetic plains of India. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 93: 127-136.




