A systematic methodology to assess bruchid field infestation and the impact of field-carry-over infestation in stored pulses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v33i4.571Keywords:
Bruchids, Field infestation, Field-carry-over inoculum, Methodology, Stored pulsesAbstract
Bruchids (Callosobruchus spp.) are serious pests of stored pulses whose incidence starts at field level and field-carry-over infestation persists in the stores. The temporal occurrence of bruchid infestation on standing crop and its subsequent impact on stored pulses has not been worked out in most of the pulses. A systematic methodology was developed to identify the crop stage where bruchids initiate the primary infestation on standing crop (i.e. infestation window) and its subsequent losses at storage level arising due to field-carryover infestation. In this methodology, the observations on pest infestation on seeds/pods were recorded at definite intervals from open and caged plants starting from the first week after flower initiation (WAFI) till harvesting of mungbean, cowpea, and pigeonpea. Further, during storage, the observations were also recorded from grains harvested from the open and caged plants representing each interval and stored in cloths bags separately and observed on a bimonthly basis for one year. Results revealed that the field infestation on the seeds/pods started from 3, 4 and 7 WAFI in mungbean, cowpea, and pigeonpea, respectively. The infestation was found to be incremental towards crop maturity and overall, the infestation on the pods at field level did not cross 6 per cent. The results obtained through systematically designed methodology explicit the timeline of bruchid infestation at field level and the impact of fieldcarry- over infestation under storage conditions. This can help to identify and intervene a timely management programme in the existing IPM schedule to break the bruchid field-carry-over chain.
References
Antoine S, Clementine D, Patoin OA and Jacques H. 2005. Field occurrence of bruchid pests of cowpea and associated parasitoids in a sub-humid zone of Burkina Faso: importance on the infestation of two cowpea
varieties at harvest. Plant Pathology Journal 4(1): 14-20.
Khadim K. and Mbacke S. 2011. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) field infestation by the bruchids (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in the northern Senegal: preliminary biological and ecological data. Journal of Applied Biosciences 41: 2788-2796.
Messina FJ. 1984. Influence of cowpea pod maturity on the oviposition choices and larval survival of a bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 35(3): 241-248.
Nahdy MS, Ellis RH, Silim SN and Smith J. 1998. Field Infestation of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) by Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) in Uganda. J. stored Prod.Res. 34(4): 207-216.
Olubayo FM and Port GR. 1997. The Efficacy of Harvest Time Modification and Intercropping as Methods of Reducing the Field Infestation of Cowpeas by Storage Bruchids in Kenya.J. stored Prod. Res. 33(4): 271-276.
Paul UV, Hilbeck A and Edwards PJ. 2010. Pre-harvest infestation of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) by Acanthoscelides obtectus Say (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in relation to bean pod maturity and pod aperture.
International Journal of Pest Management 56(1): 41–50.
Schmale I, Wackers FL, Cardona C and Dorn S. 2002. Field Infestation of Phaseolus vulgaris by Acanthoscelides obtectus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), Parasitoid Abundance, and Consequences for Storage Pest
Control. Environmental Entomology 31(5):859-863.
Warui CM. 1984. Bruchid infestation of cowpea varieties in the field. Insect Sci. Applic. 5(4): 283-286.
