Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landrace diversity of North-Western Kashmir Himalayas: Pattern of variation for morphological and yield traits and pod cooking quality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v33i3.597Keywords:
Common bean, Kashmir, landraces, GCV, PCV, cooking time score, PCAAbstract
The present study was undertaken to characterize the local landrace diversity of bean. There was a substantial variation among accessions evaluated for all the qualitative traits as depicted by the relative frequency of accessions. Out of 93 accessions, 51 were bush type and 42 were pole type with varying degree of twinning. Pods were predominantly green (79), followed by purple (4), red (2), golden (2) and others (6). Seed colour was predominantly red (53) followed by chocolate and brown (10 each), yellow (8), while as two each were pink, purple, green, black and white with varying degrees of mottling of seed coat. Eighteen accessions were small seeded, 59 were medium and 16 were large seeded. In terms of pod quality, 69 genotypes had strings and 24 were stringless. The range for days to 50 % flowering was (32.00-70.00), days to maturity was (71.00- 125.00), plant height was (37.33-275.37), the number of pods per plant was (5.78- 31.12), pod length was (7.67-26.33), seeds per pod was (2.60-7.56), 100-seed weight was (12.60-59.94) and seed yield per plant was (5.15-46.72). Higher PCV and GCV values were recorded for plant height, pods/plant, seed yield per plant, and 100-seed weight and low for days to flowering, days to maturity, and seeds per pod. High heritability was recorded for all the traits ranging from 76.69 % for seed yield per plant to 99.60 % for plant height. A significant positive correlation of seed yield with number of pods per plant, 100-seed weight and pod length and while as it was negatively correlated with days to maturity. PCA concentrated the variability in the first four principal components accounting for 78.40 % of total variation. The first two PC’s explained 51.00 % of total variation mainly contributed by number of pods per plant, 100-seed weight and plant height. Out of the ninety three accessions five accessions, WB-1129, WB-206, WB-1006, SFB-1 and Arka Komal were easy to cook and had better pod succulence.
References
Burton GW (1952) Quantitative inheritance in grasses. Proceedings of VI International Grassland Congress pp 277-283.
Byerle D, T Husain (1993) Agricultural research strategies for favoured and marginal areas: the experience of farming systems research in Pakistan. Experimental Agriculture, 29(2): 155-171
Chavez-Servia J L, E Heredia-García, N Mayek-Pérez, EN Aquino-Bola-os, S Hernández-Delgado, JC Carrillo- Rodríguez (2016) Diversity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces and the nutritional value of their grains,” in Grain Legumes, ed A. Goyal (Rijeka: InTech Open Access Publisher), 1–33.
Chiumia L, WA Msuku (2001) Status of common bean mosaic virus in common beans in Malawi. In; Proceedings of workshop on Bean Seed Multiplication, Dissemination, Entrepreneurship and Quality Concerns in East Africa: Current Status and Future Needs, Arusha, January 12-14, 2001.
Choudhary N, A Hamid, B Singh, I Khandy, PA Sofi, MA Bhat, RR Mir (2018) Insight into the origin of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown in the state of Jammu and Kashmir of north-western Himalayas. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 65(3): 963-977.
Cichy K, J Wiesinger, T Porch, P Miklas (2012). Diversity for cooking time in Andean dry beans. Bean Improvement Cooperative, 54: 50-51
Drijfhout E (1978) Genetic interaction between Phaseolus vulgaris and bean common mosaic virus with implications for strain identification and breeding for resistance. Wageningen University Press, 98 pp.
Dwivedi SL, Ceccarelli S, Blair MW, Upadhyaya HD, Are AK, Ortiz R (2016) Landrace germplasm for improving yield and abiotic stress adaptation. Trends In Plant Science, 21(1): 31-42.
FAO (Food and Agricultural Organisation). 2019. FOASTAT. www.faostat.org
Gepts P (2006) Plant genetic resources conservation and utilization: the accomplishments and future of a societal insurance policy. Crop Science, 46(5): 2278-2292.
Gepts P, DG Debouck (1991) Origin, domestication and evolution of the common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris, In: Common Beans: Research for Crop Improvement, eds O. Voysest and A. Van Schoonhoven, (Oxon, UK: CAB), 7–53.
Gioia T, G Logozzo, G Attene, E Bellucci, S Benedettelli, V Negri (2013) Evidence for Introduction Bottleneck and Extensive Inter- Gene Pool (Mesoamerica x Andes) Hybridization in the European Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Germplasm. PLoS ONE 8:e75974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075974
Kulkarni HY (1973) Notes on East African Plant Virus Diseases: 4. Bean Common Mosaic Virus. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal, 39(1): 72-76.
Langat C, O Ombori, P Leley, D Karanja, R Cheruiyot, M Gathaara, M Masila (2019) Genetic variability of agronomic traits as potential indicators of drought tolerance in common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). International Journal of Agronomy, doi.org/10.1155/2019/2360848
Larsen TH, NM Williams, C Kremen (2005) Extinction order and altered community structure rapidly disrupt ecosystem functioning. Ecology letters, 8(5): 538-547.
Lhome A (2005) Creating varieties together. A Report Submitted to Wagnengin University pp. 106.
Lush JL (1940) Intra-sire correlations or regressions of offspring on dam as a method of estimating heritability of characteristics. Journal of Animal Science, 1: 293-301.
Madakbas SY, M Ergin (2011) Morphological and phonological characterization of Turkish bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes and their present variation states. Afr J Agric Res, 6: 6155–6166
Maryanna M, M Nchimbi, SL Sawargaonkar, BV Hudge, HP Thanki (2010) Screening of 30 advanced common bean (P. vulgaris, L) lines for short cooking time using two different methods. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 1: 505-511.
Muyonga JH, J Balamaze , WM Kyamuhangire, JK Kikafunda, D Nakimbugwe, M Ugen (2008) Influence of variety, growth location and storage conditions on development of Hard-To-Cook defect in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris. L). Africa Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition and Development, 8: 332-340.
Nienhuis J, Singh SP (1988) Genetics of Seed Yield and its Components in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of Middle American Origin: I. General Combining Ability. Plant Breeding, 101(2): 143-154.
Panchbhaiya A, DK Singh, P Verma, V Jatav, AK Maurya (2017) Genetic analysis of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm through principal component analysis and D2 cluster. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 6(3): 537-542
Papa R, L Nanni, D Sicard, D Rau, G Attene (2006) The evolution of genetic diversity in Phaseolus vulgaris L. in Darwin’s Harvest: New Approaches to the Origins, Evolution and Conservation of Crops, eds T. J. Motley, N. Zerega, and H. Cross (New York, NY: Columbia University Press), 121–142. doi: 10.7312/motl13316-007
Pathania A, SK Sharma, PN Sharma (2014) Common Bean, in Broadening the Genetic Base of Grain Legumes. eds M. Singh, I. Singh Bisht, and M. Dutta, (New Delhi: Springer), pp. 11–50.
Pierce WH (1934) Viroses of the bean. Phytopathology, 24(8): 7-115
Pevicharova G, SS Bobcheva, G Zsivanovits (2015) Sensory and Instrumental texture of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) International journal of Food Properties, 18(6): 1169-1180..
Rana JC, NK Gautam, MS Gayacharan, R Yadav, K Tripathi, SK Yadav, R Bhardwaj (2016) Genetic resources of pulse crops in India: An overview. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed, 76: 420-436.
Rana JC, TR Sharma, RK Tyagi, RK Chahota, NK Gautam, M Singh, SN Ojha (2015) Characterisation of 4274 accessions of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm conserved in the Indian gene bank for phenological, morphological and agricultural traits. Euphytica, 205(2): 441-457.
Shama R, Jabeen N, Sofi PA (2019) Principal component analysis for assessment of variability in phenological and morphological traits in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L). Electronic J Plant Breed, 10(4): 1569-1575
Rawal V, DK Navarro (2019) The Global Economy of Pulses. FAO, Rome. 190 pp Ríos RO (2015) Plant Breeding In the Omics Era. Springer. 247 pp.
Saba I, PA Sofi, NA Zeerak, MA Bhat, RR Mir (2016) Characterisation of a core set of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm for seed quality traits. SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics, 48(3): 359-376.
Salgotra RK, BB Gupta (2015) Plant Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge for Food Security. Berlin: Springer. 266 pp
Santalla M, A Rodino, A De Ron (2002) Allozyme evidence supporting southwestern Europe as a secondary center of genetic diversity for the common bean. Theor. Appl.
Genet., 104: 934–944
Sofi PA, JC Rana, NA Bhat (2014a) Pattern of variation in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genetic resources of J&K. J. Food Legume, 27(3): 197-201
Sofi PA, MY Zargar, SM Razvi, FA Sheikh, Iram Saba, T Shafi (2014b) Genetic variability and factor analysis in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm collection for yield related traits. Electronic J. Plant Breeding, 5(2): 254-259
Yan W, I Rajcan (2002) Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Science, 42(1):11-20.
