Effect of seasonal variations on yield and its attributes in mungbean {Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek}

Authors

  • CHALAPATI NAGA SAI KRISHNA Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh Author
  • SANJAY KUMAR Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, Bihar Author
  • SURESH BG Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh Author
  • ANAND KUMAR Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, Bihar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v33i1.620

Keywords:

Correlation, Greebgram, Genetic variability and Path analysis

Abstract

Genetic variability, correlation and path coefficient were studied in 40 mungbean genotypes during kharif, 2017 and summer, 2018. High estimates of GCV, PCV, heritability and genetic advance were recorded for number of clusters per plant, number of pods per plant, harvest index and seed index exhibited high estimates of GCV, PCV, heritability as well as genetic advance as % of mean in both the season. Seed yield per plant showed significant positive correlation with harvest index, seed index and days to maturity during kharif and seed yield per plant showed significant and positive association with harvest index, number of pods per plant and biological yield during summer season. Path coefficient analysis revealed that harvest index had very high positive direct effect on seed yield followed by days to maturity and number of clusters per plant in kharif season while, biological yield per plant, days to maturity, number of primary branches had exhibited high positive direct effect on grain yield during summer season. The above mention of traits viz.,number of clusters per plant, number of pods per plant, harvest index and seed index should be given due emphasis for future wheat genetic improvement because they possess high genetic variance, heritability coupled with high genetic correlation among themselves which may yield high genetic advance under proper selection pressure in a greengram breeding programme. Strong association of these traits revealed that the selection based on these traits would ultimately improve the seed yield. Hence, the above mentioned characters should be given topmost priority while formulating a selection strategy for improvement of yield in greengram.

References

Al-Jibourie HA, Miller PA and Robinson HF. 1958. Genotypic and environmental variances and co-variances in upland cotton cross of inter specific origin. Agronomy Journal 50: 633-636.

Anuradha T and Suryakumari S. 2005. Genetic parameters, correlation and path analysis in greengram. Andhra Pradesh Journal of Agriculture 52: 279-281.

Burton GW. 1952. Quantitative inheritance of grasses. Proc 6th Int, Grassland Congress 1: 277-283.

Burton GW and De Vane EH. 1953. Estimating heritability in tall fescue (Festucaarundinacea) from replicated clonal material. Journal of Agronomy 45: 478-481.

Dewey JR and Lu KH. 1959. A correlation and path coefficient analysis components of crested wheat grass seed production. Journal of Agronomy 51: 515-518.

Divya Ramakrishnan CK, Savithramma DL and Vijayabharathi A. 2018. Studies on Genetic Variability, Correlation and Path Analysis for Yield and Yield Related Traits in Greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. International Journal of Current

Microbiology and Applied Science 7(3): 2753-2761.

Haritha S and Reddy Shekhar M. 2002. Correlation and path coefficient analysis in greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Legume Research 25: 180-183.

Johnson HW, Robinson HE and Comstock RE. 1955. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Journal of Agronomy 47: 314-318.

Khan NH, Islam MA, Begum M and Shamsuzzaman SM. 2008. Genetic variation for yield in mungbean (Vigna radiata). International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Technology 4(5): 40-43.

Lavanya GR. 2006. Evaluation of mungbeangermplasm for genetic variability. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources 19(1): 104-106.

Makeen K, Abrahim G, Jan A and Singh AK. 2012. Genetic variability and correlations studies on yield and its components in greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek.). Journal of Agronomy 6(1): 216-218.

Mallikarjuna Rao C, Koteswara Rao Y and Mohan Reddy. 2006. Genetic variability and path analysis in greengram. Legume Research 29: 216-218.

Panse VG and Sukhatme PV. 1967. Statistical Methods of agricultural Workers. 2nd Edition, ICAR, pp: 381, New Delhi.

Rajan REB, Wilson D and Kumar V. 2000. Correlation and path analysis in F2 segregating generation of greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Madras Journal of Agriculture 87: 10-12.

Srivastava RL and Singh G. 2012. Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis in greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Indian Journal of Life Science 2(1): 61- 65.

Thippani S, Eswari KB and Brahmeswar Rao MV. 2013. Character association between seed yield and its components in greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). International Journal of Applied Science and Pharma Technology 4(4): 295-297.

Venkateshwarlu O. 2001. Correlation and path analysis in greengram. Legume Research 24: 115-117.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Effect of seasonal variations on yield and its attributes in mungbean {Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek}. (2024). Journal of Food Legumes, 33(1), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v33i1.620