Protein content of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] genotypes as influenced by salinity stress

Authors

  • MANOJ KATIYAR Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture & Technology, Kanpur, U.P., India Author
  • R KUMAR Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture & Technology, Kanpur, U.P., India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v32i4.635

Keywords:

pH Levels, Protein content, Salinity Stress

Abstract

Eleven genotypes of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] including three farmers' preferred varieties of diverse genetic origin were tested at 4 pH levels (8.0, 8.5, 9.0 and 9.5) in a randomized block design (RBD) with 4 replications at Soil Salinity Farm, Dileep Nagar, Kanpur during kharif, 2018 and summer 2019 for Protein content. With the increase in salinity level there was a marginal reduction in protein content in almost all the genotypes during both the seasons. This reduction was 0.08 to 1.95 per cent during kharif season and 0.12 to 1.99 per cent during summer season depending upon intensity of salt stress. Among the check varieties, KM 2241, maintained its protein content in both the seasons. The test genotype 'Jalgaon' can be utilized as source of resistant genes in developing mungbean genotypes possessing high protein suitable for salinity stress.

References

Abd El-Wahab MA. 2006. The efficiency of using saline & fresh water irrigation as alternative method of irrigation on the productivity of Foeniculum vulgare under North Sinai conditions Res. J. of Agric. and Biol. Sci. 2(6): 571-577.

Arulbalachandran, D, Sankar, GK, Subramani, A. 2009. Changes in metabolites and antioxidant enzyme activity of three Vigna species induced by NaCl stress. An Eurasian J. Agron. 2: 109-116.

El-Hindi KM and El-Chamry AM. 2005. Ameliorating the injurious effects of salinity on chery gold plants using some micro-elements spray. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ. 30: 4135-4148.

Green way, H., Gibbs, J. 2003. Mechanism of anoxia tolerance in plants. II. Energy requirements for maintenance and energy distribution to essential processes. Funet. Plant Bio 30: 999-1036.

Munns R. 2005. Genes and tolerance : bring them together. New phytol. 167: 645-663.

Munns R and Tester M. 2008. Mechanism of salinity tolerance. Ann. Rev. Pl Biol 59: 651-681.

Nair RM, Schafleimer R, Kenyon L., Srinivasan R, Easdown W, Ebert RW, Hansen P. 2012. Genetic improvement of mungbean. SABRAO J. Breed. Genet. 44: 177-190.

Saha P, Chatterjee P., Biswas Ak. 2010. NaCl pretreatement alleviates salt stress by enhancement of defense and osmolyte accumulation in mungbean. Indian J. Exp. Bio. 48: 593-600.

Sarwat M.I. and El-Sherif MH. 2007. Inducing salt tolerance in some rice varieties by using some growth regulators. J. Biochem. Environ. Sci. 2: 189-215.

Sehrawat N Yadav M, Bhat KV, Sairam RK and Jaiswal PK. 2015. Effect of salinity stress on mungbean during consecutive summer and spring seasons. J. Agric. Sci. 60: 23-32.

Sehrawat, N, Jaiswal, PK, Yadav, M, Bhat, KV, Sairam, RK. 2013a. Salinity stress restraining mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) production : gateway for genetic improvement. Int. J. Agric Crop Sci 6: 505-509.

Sehrawat, N, Bhat, KV, Sairam, RK, Jaiswal, PK. 2013b. Screening of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) genotypes for salt tolerance. Int. J. Plant An. Env. Sci. 4: 36-43.

Sehrawat, N, Bhat, KV, Sairam, RK, Tomooka, N, Kaga A, Shu, Y, Jaiswal, PK. 2013c. Diversity analysis and confirmation of intraspecific hybrids for salt tolerance in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Int. J. Integ. Biol. 14: 65-73.

Sehrawat, N, Bhat, KV, Sairam, RK, Jaiswal, PK. 2013d. Indentification of salt resistant wild relatives of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Asian J. Plant Sci. Res. 3: 41-49.

Wahid, A, Hameed, M, Rasul, E. 2004. Salt injury symptoms, changes in nutrient and pigment composition and yield characteristicsof mungbean. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 6: 1143-1152.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Protein content of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] genotypes as influenced by salinity stress. (2024). Journal of Food Legumes, 32(4), 227-230. https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v32i4.635