Multivariate analysis of yield and lodging traits in a diverse collection of pea (Pisum sativum L.)

Authors

  • SHUBHRA KUJUR Department of Genetics and Plant breeding, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi- 221 005 (India Author
  • AK SINGH Department of Genetics and Plant breeding, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi- 221 005 (India Author
  • CP SRIVASTAVA Department of Genetics and Plant breeding, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi- 221 005 (India) Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v27i4.750

Keywords:

Linear stem density, Lodging, Pea, Principal component analysis (PCA), Regression, Yield

Abstract

Lodging resistance is one of the important selection criteria in pea breeding. Evaluation of 191 diverse pea genotypes was done for lodging resistance and yield traits through multivariate analysis to identify some key traits influencing lodging resistance and thereby yield potential in pea. A wide range of variation for all the seven quantitative traits viz., plant height (PH), pods per plant (PPP), test weight (TW), yield per plant (YPP), lodging score (LS), stem diameter (SD) and linear stem density (LSD) was observed in present study. Estimates of correlation coefficients showed significant positive correlations between different traits viz., PPP with PH, YPP and TW, PH with LS and LSD with SD, whereas, significant negative associations were observed between PH with SD and LSD. Principal component analysis revealed significant variation among traits with the first three principal components explaining 68% of the total variation. SD, PH, LSD and TW are important traits determining most of the variation. Cluster analysis clearly separated lodging resistant and susceptible genotypes in two distinct groups. Most of the lodging resistant genotypes were shorter in plant height than susceptible genotypes. Stepwise regression analysis revealed that plant height and stem diameter is the best predictor for lodging. The present study revealed that, short statured genotypes with greater lodging resistance can be used as parents in pea breeding programmes

References

Amelin AV and Parakhin NV. 2003. Scientific grounds for pea selection for fodder production. Kormoproizvodstvo 2: 20-25.

Amelin AV. Obraztsov AS, Lakhanov AP and Uvarov VN. 1991. Possibility of increasing the resistance of pea to lodging. Selektsiya- i-Semenovodstvo-Moskva 2: 21-23.

Bennett SJ. 2000. Genetic variation of five species of Trifolium L. from south-west Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 47: 81-91.

Dixit GP, Singh IP and Khare AP. 2002. Genetic divergence study in fieldpea. Legume Research 25: 199-201.

Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (2010) FAO Stat http://faostat.fao.org.

Hammer Ø. Harper DAT and Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4: pp 90.

Holland MR. 1990. Canopy collapse of dried pea crops. Dissertation Abstract International 50: 4284B.

Jha AB, Arganosa G, Tar'an B. Diederichsen A and Warkentin TD. 2012. Characterization of 169 diverse pea germplasm accessions for agronomic performance, Mycosphaerella blight resistance and nutritional profile. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 60: 747- 761.

Julier B. Porcheron A. Ecalle C and Guy P. 1995. Genetic variability for morphology. growth and forage yield among perennial diploid and tetraploid lucerne populations (Medicago sativa L.). Agronomie 15: 295-304.

Kaiser HF. 1959. Computer program for varimax rotation in factor analysis. Education and Psychology Measurement 19: 413-420.

Knyaz kova SR. 1987. A breeding and genetic analysis of pea forms with different types of leaf and stem. Vestnik Sel'skokhoz Nauki Moscow 1: 115-118.

Kontturi M. Laine A. Niskanen M. Hurme T. Hyövelä M and Peltonen- Sainio P. 2013. Pea-oat intercrops to sustain lodging resistance and yield formation in northern European conditions. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B - Soil and Plant Science 61: 612-621.

McPhee KE and Muehlbauer FJ. 1999. Stem strength in the score collection of Pisum germplasm. Pisum Genetics 31: 21-23.

Tyagi N. Singh AK, Rai VP, Kumar S and Srivastava CP. 2012. Genetic variability studies for lodging and yield attributes in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Journal of Food Legumes 25: 1-4.

Naghavi MR and Jahansouz MR. 2005. Variation in the agronomic and morphological traits of Iranian chickpea accessions. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 47: 375-379.

Obraztsov AS and Amelin AV. 1990. Ideotype of pea plants in relation to their resistance to lodging in the south of the non-chernozem zone of the RSFSR. CAB Abstract. AN: 901696951. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

Santalla M, Amurrio JM and De Ron AM. 2001. Food and feed potential breeding value of green, dry and vegetable pea germplasm. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 81: 601-610.

Singh AK. Tyagi N and Srivastava CP. 2012. Interrelationship among components of lodging and yield in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Vegetable Science 39: 183-185.

Singh G and Singh SP. 2003. Genetic divergence in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Legume Research 26: 131-133.

Tar an B. Warkentin T. Somers DJ. Miranda D. Vandenberg A. Blade S. Woods S. Bing D. Xue A. De Koeyer D and Penner G. 2003. Quantitative trait loci for lodging resistance, plant height and partial resistance to Mycosphaerella blight in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107: 1482-1491.

Tucak M, Popovic S and Cupic T. 2009. Karakterizacija i morfo- agronomska evaluacija germplazme lucerne. Proceedings of the 44th Croatian and 4th International Symposium on Agriculture, Opatija. 16- 20 February, Maric, S and Loncaric. Z (eds.) Faculty of Agriculture University. Osijek: 400-404.

Veasey EA. Schammass EA. Vencovsky R. Martins PS and Bandel G. 2001. Germplasm characterization of Sesbania accessions based on multivariate analyses. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 48: 79-90.

Wang TF, Gossen BD and Slinkard AE. 2006. Lodging increases severity and impact of mycosphaerella blight on field pea. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 86: 855-863.

Zakova M and Benkova M. 2006. Characterization of spring barley accessions based on multivariate analysis. Communications in Biometry and Crop Science 1: 124-134.

Zeid M. Belay G. Mulkey S, Poland J and Sorrells ME. 2011. QTL mapping for yield and lodging resistance in an enhanced SSR-based map for tef. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 122: 77-93.

Zhang C. Tar'an B. Warkentin T, Tullu A. Kirstin EB. Vandenberg B and Somers DJ. 2006. Selection for lodging resistance in early generations of field pea by molecular markers. Crop Science 46: 321-329.

Zuber U, Winzeler H. Messmer MM, Keller M. Keller B. Schmid JE and Stamp P. 1999. Morphological traits associated with lodging resistance of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 182: 17-24.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-04

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Multivariate analysis of yield and lodging traits in a diverse collection of pea (Pisum sativum L.) . (2024). Journal of Food Legumes, 27(4), 293-296. https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v27i4.750