Participatory technology development for enhancing farm income with chickpea cultivation in watersheds of central India

Authors

  • PK PANDA Directorate of Water Management, Bhubaneswar-751023 Author
  • AK SINGH CSWCR&TI Research Centre, Agra-282006 Author
  • SK DUBEY CSWCR&TI Research Centre, Agra Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v27i4.754

Keywords:

Central India, Chickpea, Farm income, PTD, Watershed

Abstract

An on-farm participatory technology development programme was undertaken in Jalalpur watershed of Agra district using harvested runoff during Rabi 2011 and 2012 to evaluate the performance of two chickpea cultivars viz., Kabuli ‘SUBHRA' and Desi PUSA DHARWAD' under three nutrient management options (Recommended application of 20:40:20:20 Kg/ha of N:P:K:S along with 2 tonnes of FYM/ha, farmers' practice of 100 kg DAP + 1 tonnes of FYM/ha and a control i.e., without any fertilizer). The nutrient management options (main plots) and chickpea varieties (sub plots) were laid out in a split plot with four replications. SUBHRA out performed with higher seed yield of 2086 Kg/ha over that in PUSA DHARWAD (1944 Kg/ha) at recommended practices. Recommended practices also recorded higher water use efficiency, organic carbon, available nitrogen, phosphorous, potassium and sulphur over both farmers' practice and control. It also lowered down EC and pH after harvest of the crop compared to both farmers' practice and control. The study suggested that farmers can get additional benefit of INR 10902/- from improved variety (SUBHRA) by following recommended practices.

References

Choudhary OP. Josan AS. Bajwa MS. and Kapur ML. 2004. Effect of sustained sodic and saline-sodic irrigation and application of gypsum and farmyard manure on yield and quality of sugarcane under semi- arid conditions. Field Crops Research 87: 113-116.

Gomez KA and Gomez AA. 1983. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. A Wiley Interscience Publication. John Wiley and Sons. New York.

Hunsigi G and Krishna KR. 1998. Science of Field Crop Production. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi. Pp 151-169.

Quispel A. 1974. The Biological Nitrogen Fixation. North Holand Publishing Co.. Amsterdam.

Majumdar DK. 2000. Irrigation Water Management: Principles and Practices. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi 110001. Pp 251-252.

NRAA. 2008. Common Guidelines for Watershed Management Projects. Department of Land development and Water resources. Ministry of Rural Developments, Govt. of India. New Delhi.

Pramanik SC. Singh NB and Singh KK. 2009. Yield, economics and water use efficiency of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under various irrigation regimes on raised bed planting system. Indian Journal of Agronomy 53:315-318.

Ram H and Dwivedi KN. 1992. Effect of source and level of sulphur on yield and grain quality of chickpea. Indian Journal of Agronomy 37:112-114.

Ramakrishna A. Wani SP. Srinivasa Rao C and Srinivas U. 2005. Increased chickpea yield and economic benefits by improved crop production technology in rainfed areas of Kurnool district of Andhra Pradesh, India. SAT e Journal 1: 1-3.

Ramakrishna YS, Subba Reddy G. Chary GR and Prasad YG. 2009. Improving productivity of grain legumes under moisture stress condition. In: Masood Ali, Sanjeeb Gupta, P.S. Baru and Naimuddin (Eds). Legumes for Ecological Sustainability. Indian Society of Pulses Research and Development. IIPR. Kanpur. Pp 92-117.

Saxsena MC. 1987. Agronomy of Chickpea. In: MC Saxena and KB Singh (Eds). Chickpea. CAB International. Wallingford, UK. Pp 207-232.

Srivastava RP and Ali M. 2004. Nutritional Quality of Common Pulses. Indian Institute of Pulses Research. Kanpur 208024. Pp 14-21.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-04

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Participatory technology development for enhancing farm income with chickpea cultivation in watersheds of central India . (2024). Journal of Food Legumes, 27(4), 315-318. https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v27i4.754