Genotypic characterization of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) genotypes using molecular markers

Authors

  • ANUBHA GUPTA Department of Molecular Biology & Genetic Engineering, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut- 250 110, U.P., India Author
  • ANIL SIROHI Department of Molecular Biology & Genetic Engineering, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut- 250 110, U.P., India Author
  • DEVI SINGH Molecular Biology Laboratory, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, S.V.P University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut- 250 110, U.P., India Author
  • PRINCI RANI Department of Molecular Biology & Genetic Engineering, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut- 250 110, U.P., India Author
  • NAVNEET KUMAR Molecular Biology Laboratory, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, S.V.P University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut- 250 110, U.P., India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v27i3.772

Keywords:

Genetic diversity, ISSR, Pigeonpea, RAPD

Abstract

Genetic diversity of 42 pigaonpea genotypes was evaluated using 10 RAPD and 10 ISSR markers. Among these, RAPD primers generated 40 bands, out of which 37 were polymorphic and ISSR primers produced 56 bands, out of which 50 were polymorphic. RAPD primers detected more polymorphic loci (92.5%) than the ISSR primers (89.3%). Mean PIC for each of these marker systems (0.86 for RAPD and 0.71 for ISSR), indicated better PIC value of the RAPD markers. Comparison of resolving power of two marker systems (2.15 for RAPD and 4.48 for ISSR), showed better resolving power of the ISSR markers. Based upon Jaccard's similarity coefficient and cluster analysis using UPGMA of both RAPD and ISSR primers, pigeonpea genotypes 'AL-201', 'UPAS-120', 'ICP-9174', 'ICP- 10957' & 'ICPL-88034' were found to be quite distinct and can be used for their desirable characteristics in breeding programmes. Dendograms generated using RAPD and ISSR data were comparable with minor clustering differences, which suggests that either a method, or combination of both can be applied to expanded genetic diversity studies in Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) and identify variation within genotypes.

References

Anderson JA, Churchill GA, Autrique JE, Tansley SD and Sorrells ME. 1993. Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage map. Genome 36: 181-186.

Choudhury PR, Singh IP, George B, Verma AK and Singh NP. 2008. Assessment of genetic diversity of pigeon pea cultivars using RAPD analysis. Biologiaplantarum 52(4): 648-653.

Datta S, Kaashyap M and Kumar S. (2010). Amplification of chickpea SSR primers in Cajanus species and their validity in diversity analysis.Plant Breeding. 129(3): 334-340.

Datta S, Singh P, Mahfooz S, Choudhary AK, Chaturvedi SK and Nadarajan N. 2013a. Conservation of Genic and Genomic Microsatellite Regions across Legume Genera Allows Marker Transferability for Polymorphism Studies in Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh]. Australian Journal of Crop Sciences. 7: 1990- 1997.

Datta S, Singh P, Mahfooz S, Patil P, Chaudhary AK, Agbagwa IO and Nadarajan N. 2013b. Novel genic microsatellite markers from Cajanusscarabaeoides and their comparative efficiency in revealing genetic diversity in pigeonpea. Journal of Genetics. 92, e24-e30

Gupta S, Srivastava M, Mishra GP, Naik PK, Chauhan RS, Tiwari SK, Kumar M and Singh R. 2008.Analogy of ISSR and RAPD markers for comparative analysis of genetic diversity among different Jatrophacurcasgenotypes. African Journal of Biotechnology 7(23): 4230-4243.

Jaccard P. 1908.Nouvelles researches surla distribution florale. Bull. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat 44: 223-270.

Moller EM, Bahnweg G, Sandermann H and Geiger HH. 1992. A simple and efficient protocol for isolation of high molecular weight DNA from filament fungi, fruit bodies and infected plant tissue. Nucelic acid Research 20: 6115-6116.

Muthusamy S, Kanagarajan S and Ponnusamy S. 2008.Efficiency of RAPD and ISSR markers system in accessing genetic variation of rice bean (Vignaumbellata) landraces. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 11: 3.

Nagaraju J, Kathirvel M, Subbaiah EV, Muthulakshmi M and Kumar LD. 2002.FISSR-PCR: a simple and sensitive assay for high throughput genotyping and genetic mapping. Molecular and Cellular Probes 16: 67-72.

Prevost A and Wilkinson MJ. 1999. A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics98: 107-112.

Rohlf FJ. 1993. NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, Version 1.70, Exeter Software, Setauket, NY.

Saiki RK, Gelfond DH, Stoffel S, Scharf SJ, Higuchi R, Horn GT, Mullis, KB and Erlich HA. 1988. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a termo-stable DNA polymerase. Science 239: 487- 491.

Sneath PHA and Sokal RR. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. The principles and practice of numerical classification. Freeman and Company: San Francisco CA. 143-148.

Soller M and Beckmann JS. 1983. Genetic polymorphism in varietal identification and genetic improvement. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 67(1): 25-33.

Souframanien J and Gopalakrishna T. 2004.A comparative analysis of genetic diversity in blackgram genotypes using RAPD and ISSR markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109: 1687-1693.

VarshneyRK, Chen W, Li Y, Bharti AK, SaxenaRK,SchlueterJA, DonoghueMT, AzamS, FanG, Whaley AM, Farmer AD, SheridanJ, Iwata A, TutejaR, Penmetsa RV, Wu W, Upadhyaya HD, Yang SP, Saxena KB, Shah T, Michael T, McCombie WR, Yang B, Zhang G, Yang H, Wang J, Spillane C, Cook DR, May GD, Xu X and Jackson SA. 2011. Draft genome sequence of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) an orphan legume crop of resource-poor farmers. Nature Biotechnology 30: 83-89.

Yadav K, Yadav SK, Yadav A, Pandey VP and Dwivedi UN. 2012. Genetic Diversity of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) Cultivars and Its Wild Relatives Using Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Markers. American Journal of Plant Sciences.322-330.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-04

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Genotypic characterization of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) genotypes using molecular markers . (2024). Journal of Food Legumes, 27(3), 186-191. https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v27i3.772