Estimation of genetic diversity in fieldpea (Pisum sativum L.) based on analysis of hyper-variable regions of the genome
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v27i2.799Keywords:
Genetic diversity, Markers, Microsatellite, Pisum sativumAbstract
The genetic diversity present in the widely adapted Indian fieldpea varieties, many of which are from exotic background, has rarely been studied with DNA based markers. Forty-five microsatellite markers were used to assess the genetic variation within twenty four elite pea cultivars grown extensively in India. Out of total 45 markers, 39 markers amplified a total of 55 alleles with an average of 1.4 alleles per marker. Maximum diversity was recorded between cultivars KPMR 44-1 and Ambika. The average similarity coefficient value was found to be 0.84. Cluster analysis based on Dice similarity coefficient using UPGMA, grouped tall type and dwarf type varieties into two different clusters based upon their pedigree. Very low polymorphism within the studied genotypes indicates an urgent need to include diverse parents in fieldpea breeding programmes. The present study also generated valuable information about the comparative usefulness of genic and genomic microsatellite markers. Genomic microsatellite markers showed higher degree of polymorphism compared to the genic microsatellite markers.
References
Abdelnoor RV, Barros EG and Moreira MA. 1995. Determination of genetic diversity within Brazilian soybean germplasm using random amplified DNA amplification techniques and comparative analysis with pedigree data. Brazilian Journal of Genetics 18: 265-273.
Anderson JA, Churchill GA, Autrique JE, Sollers ME and Tanksley SD.1993. Optimizing parental selection for genetic linkage maps. Genome 36: 181-186.
Blair MW, Pedraza F, Buendia HF, Gaitan-Solis E, Beebe SEGepts P and Tohme J. 2003. Development of a genome-wide anchored microsatellite map for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107:1362-1374.
Buhariwalla HK, Jayashree B, Eshwar K and Crouch JH. 2005. Development of ESTs from chickpea roots and their use in diversity analysis of the Cicer genus. BMC Plant Biology 5:16-30.
Burstin J, Deniot G, Potier J, Weinachter C, Aubert G, Baranger A. 2001. Microsatellite polymorphism in Pisum sativum. Plant Breeding 120: 311-317.
Choudhary PR, Tanveer H and Dixit GP. 2007. Identification and detection of genetic relatedness among important varieties of pea (Pisum sativum L.) grown in India. Genetica 130: 183-191.
Cox TS and Murphy JP. 1990. The effect of parental divergence on F2 heterosis in winter wheat crosses. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 79: 241–250.
Cupic T, Tucak M, Popovic S, Bolaric S, Grljusic S and Kozumplik V. 2009. Genetic diversity of pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes assessed by pedigree, morphological and molecular data. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment 7: 343-348.
Datta S, Kaashyap M and Kumar S. 2010a. Amplification of chickpea SSR primers in Cajanus species and their validity in diversity analysis. Plant Breeding 129: 334-340.
Datta S, Kaashyap M, Singh P, Gupta PP, Anjum KT, Mahfooz S and Gupta S. 2012. Conservation of microsatellite regions across legume genera enhances marker repertoire and genetic diversity study inPhaseolus genotypes. Plant Breeding 131: 307-311.
Datta S, Mahfooz S, Singh P, Choudhary AK, Singh F and Kumar S. 2010b. Cross-genera amplification of informative microsatellite markers from common bean and lentil for the assessment of genetic diversity in pigeonpea. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 16:123-134.
Datta S, Tiwari S, Kaashyap M, Gupta PP, Choudhary P R, Kumari J and Kumar S. 2011. Genetic similarity analysis in lentil using crossgenera legume sequence tagged microsatellite site markers. Crop Science 51: 2412–2422.
Dice LR.1945. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26: 297-302.
Dixit GP and Katiyar PK. 2006. Genetic base of Indian fieldpea (Pisum sativam L.) varieties and breeding lines developed in India. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 66: 316-318.
Don RH, Cox PT, Wainwright BJ, Baker K and Mattick JS.1991.Touchdown PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Research 19:4008.
Eujayl I, Sorrells M, Baum M, Wolters P and Powell W. 2001.Assessment of genotypic variation among cultivated durum wheat based on EST-SSRs and genomic SSRs. Euphytica 119: 39-43.
FAO 2011. http://faostat.fao.org/site/567
Gowhar A, Mudasir, Kudesia R, Shikha and Srivastava MK. 2010. Evaluation of genetic diversity in pea (Pisum sativum L.) using RAPD Analysis. Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Journal GEBJ-16.
Hanai LR, Tatina DC,Comargo LEA, Benchimol de Souza LL et al. 2007. Development characterization and comparative analysis of polymorphism at common bean SSR loci isolated from genic and genomic resources. Genome 50: 266-277.
Hempel K and Peakall R. 2003. Cross-species amplification from crop soybean (Glycine max) provides informative microsatellite markers for the study of inbreeding wild relatives. Genome 46: 382-393.
Kisha TJ, Sneller CH and Diers BW. 1997. Relationship between genetic distance among parents and genetic variance in population of soybean. Crop Science 37: 1317-1325.
Loridon K, McPhee K, Morin J, Dubreuil P, Pilet-Nayel ML, Aubert G, Rameau C, Baranger A, Coyne C, Lejeune-Henaut I and Burstin J. 2005. Microsatellite marker polymorphism and mapping in pea Fig. 2. UPGMA dendrogram based on the 54 alleles amplified in 24 pea genotypes
Datta et al. : Estimation of genetic diversity in fieldpea (Pisum sativum L.) based on analysis of hyper 9 1 (Pisum sativum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 111: 1022-1031.
Manjarrez-Sandoval P,Carter Jr TE, Webb DM and Burton JW. 1997. RFLP genetic similarity estimates and coefficient of parentage as genetic variance predictors for soybean yield. Crop Science 37:698-703.
Mantel N.1967. Detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27: 209-220.
Muhammad S, Bacha S, Muhammad A and Ghafoor A. 2009. Genetic diversity for determining yield potential and selection criteria in Pisum sativum L., genetic resources. Pakistan Journal of Botany 41: 2987-2993.
Nasiri J, Haghnazari A and Saba J. 2009. Genetic diversity among varieties and wild species accessions of pea (Pisum sativum L.) based on SSR markers. African Journal of Biotechnology 8: 3405-3417.
Nisar M, Ghafoor A, Ahmad H, Khan MR, Qureshi AS, Ali H and Islam M. 2008. Evaluation of genetic diversity of pea germplasm through phenotypic trait analysis. Pakistan Journal of Botany 40: 2081-2086.
Odeny DA, Jayashree B, Gebhardt C and Crouch J. 2009. New microsatellite markers for pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) millsp.). BMC Research Notes doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-2-35.
Posvee Z and Griga M. 2000. Utilization of isozyme polymorphism for cultivar identification of 45 commercial peas (Pisum sativum L.). Euphytica 113: 251-258.
Rohlf FJ .1998. NTSYS-PC Numerical taxonomy and Multivariate analysis system Version 2.1, Exeter Software, Applied Biostatistics, New York, USA
Rungis D. 2004. Robust simple sequences repeat markers for spruce (Picea spp.) from expressed sequence tags. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109: 1283–1294.
Santalla M, Amurrio JM and De Ron AM. 2001. Food and feed potential breeding value of green, dry and vegetable pea germplasm. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 81: 601-610.
Saxena RK, Prathima C, Saxena KB, Hoisington, DA, Singh NK and Varshney RK. 2009. Novel SSR Markers for Polymorphism Detection in Pigeonpea (Cajanus spp.). Plant Breeding 129: 142-148.
Scott KD. 2000. Analysis of SSRs derived from grape ESTs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 100: 723–726.
Simioniuc D, Uptmoor R, Friedt W and Ordon F. 2002.Genetic diversity and relationships among pea cultivars revealed by RAPDs and AFLPs. Plant Breeding 121: 429-435.
Sorensen T. 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab 5: 1-34.
Souza E and Sorell ME. 1991. Prediction of progeny variation in oat from parental genetic relationships. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 82: 233-241.
Tar’an B, Zhang C, Warkentin TA and Vandenberg. 2005. Genetic diversity among varieties and wild species accessions of pea (Pisum sativum L) on molecular markers and morphological and physiological characters. Genome 48: 257-272.
Varshney RK, Garner A and Sorell ME. 2005. Genic microsatellite markers in plants: features and application. Trends in Biotechnology 23: 48-55.
Vershinin AV, Allnutt TR, Knox MR, Ambrose MJ and Ellis THN. 2003. Transposable elements reveal the impact of introgression, rather than transposition, in Pisum diversity, evolution and domestication. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 2067-2075.
Winter P, Pfaff T , Udupa SM, Huttel B, Sharma PC, Sahi S, Aireguin- Espinoza R, Weigand F, Muehlbauer FJ and Kahl G.1999. Characterization and mapping of sequence tagged microsatellite sites in chickpea (Cicer arietimum L.) genome. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 262:90-101.
Yadav VK, Kumar S, Panwar RK. 2007. Measurement of genetic diversity in fieldpea (Pisum sativum L.) genotype using RAPD markers. Genetics Research and Crop Evolution 54:1285-1289.
Zietkiewiz E, Rafalski A and Labuda D. 1994. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymorphism chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20: 176-183.
Zong X, Liu Redden RJ, Wang S, Gaun J, Liu J, Xu Y, Gu J, Yan L, Ades P and Ford R. 2009. Analysis of a diverse global Pisum sp. Collection and comparison to a Chinese local P. sativum collection with microsatellite markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 118:193-204.
