Adoption gap as the determinant of instability in Indian legume production

Authors

  • M.S. NAIN Division of Agril. Extension, IARI, New Delhi-110 012, India Author
  • S.K. DUBEY Division of Agril. Extension, IARI, New Delhi-110 012, India Author
  • N.V. KUMBHARE Division of Agril. Extension, IARI, New Delhi-110 012, India Author
  • RAM BAHAL Division of Agril. Extension, IARI, New Delhi-110 012, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v27i2.817

Keywords:

Adoption status, area potential gap matrix, recommended pulse production technology

Abstract

The underlying determinants of yield gaps need to be understood for making appropriate policy prescriptions to increase production in the short-run and to eliminate or reduce yield gaps between research station, on-farm demonstration and farmer’s fields. Suitable technologies extended to the farmers are readily adopted by some while others may not be interested. It emphasizes the need for identifying and quantifying level of adoption and its determinants across agro climatic regions. As such adoption gap analysis was carried out for pigeon pea and chickpea in high potential high gap states and districts of India. The recommendation domain was used in the study to ascertain the adoption gaps at farmers’ level. The results showed that high to medium level of adoption gaps were observed in almost all the recommendation domains in both the crops. Nearly 80 percent of the respondents had not adopted manurial aspects of the crop and 76 percent had not gone for any plant protection measures. Only 29 per cent adopted the recommended varieties and nearly 60 per cent adopted agronomic practices. On the basis of the results obtained it can be recommended to have appropriate training for the extension workers and subsequently to farmers with availability of matching input supply system. Instead of delaying extension efforts for the research results, extension workers may transfer farmers’ innovative practices to other farmers and locations. If variability of yields from the same seeds is found in different locations and at farmer to farmer field in the same location, pulse breeding research for development and/or introduction of location specific high yielding variety may be recommended.

Author Biography

  • M.S. NAIN, Division of Agril. Extension, IARI, New Delhi-110 012, India

    Present Address: ZPD, Kanpur, India

References

Ali M. 1998.Research, Development and management for production of pulses. In IPM System in Agriculture. Volume 4. Pulses, R.K.Upadhyay, K.G.Mukerji and R.L.Rajak (Eds.) Aditya Books Private Limited ,New Delhi. pp 1–40.

Arunachalam L, Purushothaman S, Palaniappan SP and Devasahayam M.Mark. 1995. Relative contribution of non-monetary/low cost inputs in red gram production. Madras Agric.Journal. 82: 179- 181.

Avinashilingam Vijay N.A. and Singh Gyanendra .2013. Adoption of improved practices of pigeonpea. Journal of Food Legumes 26: 93-95.

Cassman KG, Peng S, Olk DC, Ladha JK, Reichardt W, Dobermann A and Singh U.1998. Opportunities for increased nitrogen-use efficiency from improved resource management in irrigated rice systems. Field Crops Research. 56: 7-39.

Hall A, Sulaiman R.V. and Raina R.2005. From dissemination technologies to promoting innovation. Pp15 In: R. Sulaiman (ed.)

Implications for Agricultural Extensions in New Insight on Reforming Agricultural Extension. National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, Mumbai.

Jeswani LM and Baldev B.1988. Advances in pulse production technology. ICAR Pusa, New Delhi, pp 114.

Kumar S, Bourai VA and Kumar H. 2011. Post harvest losses in pulses of Uttarakhand (A Specific study of sample villages of Assan valley). Economic Affairs. 56: 243-247.

Kumar P, Peshin R., Nain M.S. and Kumar V. 2010. Constraints in pulses cultivation as perceived by the farmers. Green Farming International Journal of Applied Agriculture and Horticulture Science. 1: 52-54.

Materne and Reddy AA. 2007. Commercial cultivation and profitability. In SS Yadav, David McNeil and Philip C. Stevenson (ed). The Lentil — an ancient crop for modern times Springer, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. pp 173-186

Matson PA, Naylor R and Ortiz-Monasterio I. 1998. Integration of environmental, agronomic, and economic aspects of fertilizer management. Science. 280: 112–115.

Nain MS, Singh R, Vijayragavan K, Vyas AK. 2012. Participatory linkage of farmers, technology and agricultural researchers for improved wheat production in national capital region of India. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 7: 5198-5207.

Puste AM and Jana PK .1995. Effect of phosphorus and zinc on the yield attributes and yield of pigeon pea varieties grown during winter season. Madras Agricultural Journal. 82: 348–351.

Ramakrishna A, Wani SP, Rao Ch Srinivasa and Reddy U Srinivas 2005. SAT eJournal | ejournal. icrisat.org http://www.icrisat.org/journal/ cropimprovement/v1i1/icpn12/v1i1effect.pdf

Reddy AA. 2009. Pulses production technology: Status and way forward, Economic and Political Weekly. 44: 73-82.

Sanchez PA .2002. Soil fertility and hunger in Africa. Science. 295: 201–202.

Smil V. 2001. Enriching the Earth. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Singh SK., Riyajuddeen , Ojha VS and Yadav S. 2013. Area expansion under improved varieties of lentil through participatory seed production programme in Ballia District of Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Food Legumes 26: 115-119.

Subba Rao NS. 1995. Bio fertilizers in Agriculture and forestry, Oxford & IBH, Publications, Bombay pp 240.

Yadav RP, Sharma RK and Shrivastava UK . 1997. Fertility management in pigeon pea based intercropping system under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 42: 46-49.

Vitousek, P.M. (1994). Beyond global warming: ecology and global change. Ecology. 75: 1861–1876.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Adoption gap as the determinant of instability in Indian legume production . (2024). Journal of Food Legumes, 27(2), 146-150. https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v27i2.817