Nutritional characterization of improved lines and cultivars of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Authors

  • BAYAHI KAOUTHAR University of Tunis el Manar, Faculty of Sciences of Tunis (FST), Department of Biological Sciences, Genetics and Molecular Biology.Campus Universitaire 2092 - El Manar Tunis Author
  • REZGUI SALAH National Agronomical Institute of Tunisia, Dept. ABV, INAT. 43 Avenue Charles Nicole, CitéMahrajène, Tunis, 1082. Tunisia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v28i3.956

Keywords:

Chickpea grain quality, Flour nutritional quality, Technological traits, Physic-chemical properties, Genetic improvement

Abstract

Chickpea (Cicerarietinum L.) is an important legume for food world safetybecause of its high nutritional value. The genetic improvement of adapted varieties aims to release new varieties withhigh qualitative, nutritional and esthetic quality (grains of big size, with beige color andshort cooking time) required by the consumption and the world trade.The important efforts displayedaim to limit the genetic erosion which threatens this legume, and will enlarge and diversify genetic resources of chickpea. This study is an attempt fornutritional characterizations of sixteen winter chickpea lines among which eleven are high yielding varieties and source of resistance to Ascochyta blight but have small size of grains (Kasseb(line 12), Chétoui(line 13), Bouchra (line14), Neyer (line15) and Béjal (line16)).The evaluation of the geneticmaterial revealedthat the two lines 6 and 5 have the biggest size andweight of grains, capacity of hydration and inflation,high protein content, and ashort cooking time. The lines 6 and 5 were selected best lines of the collection for nutritional qualities. A genetic analysis of the characters studied confirms that improvement of chickpea quality is possible in early generations ofbreeding programs. 

References

AOAC. (1990). Official Methods of Analysis (15th edn). Association Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA, Method 920.87, 920.85, 973.18, 989.03.

FAO. (1996). Codex Alimentaires :céréales, légumessecs, légumineuses, produits dérivés et protéines végétales. FAO. VO17.2édition. Rome. 164 p.

Godon B. (1985). Protéines végétales. 213, technique et documentation. Lavoisier, Paris.

Govil JN. 1980. Plant type in relation to protein yield and disease resistance in chickpea (Cicerarietinum L.). Legume Research 3: 38-44.

Gupta N and Singh RS. 1982. Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and sulphur nutrition on protein and amino acids in Bengal gram (Cicerarietinum L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 16: 113-117.

Jimenez-Cuesta M, Cuquerella J and Martinez-Javega JM. 1981. Determination of color index for citrus degreening. Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture, 2:750-753.

Niknejad M. Khosh-khui M and Ghorashy SR. 1971. Inheritance of seed size in chickpea (Cicerarietinum L.). Crop Science 11: 768-769.

Singh KB, Williams PC and Nakkoul H. 1986b. Influence of winter planting on yield and some quality parameters of kabuli-type chickpea. Field Crop Research (in press).

Singh U and Williams P. 1987. Nutritional quality and the evaluation of quality in breeding programme. In: The Chickpea (Saxena, MC and Singh KB eds). Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CAB International. pp. 329-356.

WHO/FAO. 2003. Diet, nutrition and the preventionof chronic diseases: Report of aexpert consultation. In: WHO Technical Report Series 916. World Health Organization (WHO) and the Foodand Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, Geneva, p. 160.

Williams PC, Nakkoul H and Singh KB. 1983. Relashionship between cooking time and some physical characteristics in chickpeas (Cicerarietinum L.). Journal of Agricultural Research 34: 492- 296.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Nutritional characterization of improved lines and cultivars of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) . (2024). Journal of Food Legumes, 28(3), 231-234. https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v28i3.956