Arid Pulses for Climate-Resilient Agriculture: Production Constraints, Adaptive Physiology, and Sustainable Intensification

Authors

  • B. Lal ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Regional Research Centre, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India Author
  • N Kumar ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, U.P. India Author
  • Priyanka Gautam ICAR-National Research Centre on Camel, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India Author
  • VS Rathore ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India Author
  • NS Nathawat ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India Author
  • SK Aggarwal ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Regional Research Centre, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India Author
  • Sudheer Kumar ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Regional Research Centre, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India Author

Keywords:

Dryland agriculture, pulse crops, drought–heat interaction, yield stability, nitrogen fixation trade-offs, climate resilience

Abstract

Arid and semi-arid regions are expanding globally under climate change, yet crop improvement and agronomic research remain disproportionately focused on irrigated, high-input systems. Pulses adapted to dry environments are moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba), mung bean (Vigna radiata), and chickpea (Cicer arietinum) are widely promoted as climate-resilient crops due to their drought tolerance and biological nitrogen fixation. Despite this, yields of arid pulses have stagnated for decades, and their on-farm performance remains highly variable. This review critically examines the paradox of high stress tolerance but low and unstable productivity in arid pulses. Rather than a crop-wise description, we synthesize evidence across species to analyze physiological thresholds, reproductive vulnerabilities, nitrogen fixation trade-offs, and agronomic mismatches that constrain yield formation under arid conditions. We further evaluate the role of arid pulses in dryland cropping systems, soil health, and climate adaptation, highlighting where system-level benefits mask crop-level yield penalties. We argue that the primary limitation of arid pulses is not genetic inadequacy but the disconnect between survival-oriented traits and sink development under combined drought and heat stress. The review concludes by identifying priority research directions centered on thresholdbased physiology, trait-focused breeding under realistic field stress, and longterm system experiments necessary to unlock the productivity potential of arid pulses in climate-resilient agriculture.

References

Blum A. 2011. Plant breeding for water-limited environments. Springer.

CAZRI. 2019. Annual report: Climate variability and crop performance in the arid zone of Rajasthan. Central Arid Zone Research Institute Jodhpur.

Devasirvatham V Gaur PM Mallikarjuna N Trethowan RM Tan DKY and Turner NC. 2012. Effect of high temperature on pollen viability pod set and seed yield in chickpea. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 198: 436–446.

FAO. 2011. The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome.

FAO. 2020. FAOSTAT statistical database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Graham PH and Vance CP. 2003. Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiology 131: 872–877.

Hall AE. 2004. Breeding for adaptation to drought and heat in cowpea. European Journal of Agronomy 21: 447–454.

Hall AE. 2010. Phenotyping cowpeas for adaptation to drought and heat. Field Crops Research 116: 95–102.

ICRISAT. 2016. Grain legumes strategies for dryland agriculture. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics Hyderabad.

IPCC. 2022. Climate Change 2022: Impacts Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

Kashiwagi J Krishnamurthy L Upadhyaya HD Gaur PM and Turner NC. 2006. Genetic variability for root length density and its contribution to seed yield in chickpea under drought stress. Field Crops Research 95: 171–179.

Kaushal N Bhandari K Siddique KHM and Nayyar H. 2013. Food crops face rising temperatures: An overview of responses adaptive mechanisms and approaches to improve heat tolerance. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 199: 1–20.

Krishnamurthy L Kashiwagi J Gaur PM Upadhyaya HD Vadez V and Turner NC. 2011. Variation in reproductive success of chickpea under terminal drought. Field Crops Research 121: 205–211.

Kumar S Sharma R and Meena R. 2018. Impact of insect pests on moth bean and mung bean in western Rajasthan. Journal of Arid Agriculture 6: 45–53.

Kumar S Singh RC and Meena H. 2021. Pulses in dryland agriculture: challenges and opportunities. Indian Journal of Agronomy 66: 1–10.

Lobell DB Schlenker W and Costa-Roberts J. 2011. Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science 333: 616–620.

Mittler R. 2006. Abiotic stress the field environment and stress combination. Trends in Plant Science 11: 15–19.

Mudgil D Barak S and Khatkar BS. 2014. Guar gum: processing properties and food applications—A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology 51: 409–418.

Passioura JB. 2006. Increasing crop productivity when water is scarce—From breeding to field management. Agricultural Water Management 80: 176–196.

Passioura JB. 2012. Phenotyping for drought tolerance in grain crops. Functional Plant Biology 39: 851–859.

Pathak R Singh SK and Singh M. 2010. Effect of moisture stress on yield and quality of clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 80: 598–601.

Peoples MB Brockwell J Herridge DF Ladha JK Monteiro F Olk DC Santos E and Singleton PW. 2009. The contributions of nitrogen-fixing crop legumes to the productivity of agricultural systems. Symbiosis 48: 1–17.

Prasad PVV Bheemanahalli R and Jagadish SVK. 2017. Field crops and the fear of heat stress. Trends in Plant Science 22: 573–584.

Prasad PVV Boote KJ Allen LH and Thomas JMG. 2008. Effects of elevated temperature on pollen germination and seed set in grain legumes. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 194: 328–337.

Reynolds MP Braun HJ Cavalieri AJ Chapman SC Tuberosa R and Cattivelli L. 2021. Improving crop productivity through stress resilience. Nature Plants 7: 142–150.

Rockström J Karlberg L Wani SP Barron J Hatibu N Oweis T Bruggeman A Farahani H and Qiang Z. 2010. Managing water in rainfed agriculture. Agricultural Water Management 97: 543–550.

Sehgal A Sita K Kumar J Singh P Sharma R and Yadav A. 2018. Effects of drought and heat stress on seed filling in legumes. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 204: 1–15.

Sharma P Singh M and Yadav A. 2020. Incidence of major diseases in chickpea under arid conditions of Rajasthan. Legume Research 43: 750–758.

Siddique KHM Johansen C Turner NC Siddique B and Thierfelder C. 2013. Innovations in agronomy for chickpea improvement. Agronomy Journal 105: 122– 133.

Sinclair TR and Rufty TW. 2012. Nitrogen and water resources commonly limit crop yield increases. Journal of Agricultural Science 150: 435–448.

Singh NP Reddy BVS and Blümmel M. 2014. Role of legumes in dryland farming systems. Current Science 107: 1029–1037.

Thornton PK Ericksen PJ Herrero M and Challinor AJ. 2014. Climate variability and vulnerability to climate change. Global Change Biology 20: 3313–3328.

Turner NC Wright GC and Siddique KHM. 2007. Adaptation of grain legumes to water-limited environments. Advances in Agronomy 94: 123–231.

van Ittersum MK Cassman KG Grassini P Wolf J Tittonell P and Hochman Z. 2013. Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—A review. Field Crops Research 143: 4–17.

Yadav OP Meena RL Singh M and Sharma P. 2017. Performance of clusterbean varieties under rainfed arid conditions. Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development 32: 1–7.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-25

Issue

Section

Review Paper

How to Cite

Arid Pulses for Climate-Resilient Agriculture: Production Constraints, Adaptive Physiology, and Sustainable Intensification. (2026). Journal of Food Legumes, 39(Special issue), 195-204. https://pub.isprd.in/index.php/jfl/article/view/2379