Ovipositional preference of bruchid (Callosobruchus Maculatus Fabricius) on pod character and pod maturity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/jfl.v26i3&4.870Keywords:
Pulses, Callosobruchus maculates, Ovipositional preference, Pod maturity characterAbstract
The ovipositional preference of bruchid, Callosobruchus chinensis on different pulse crops with their varying maturity was conducted through free-choice test to investigate its oviposition behaviour and progeny development under ambient laboratory condition. Pods at different maturity stages, based on color and morphological characters were used to study the egg laying potential of pulse beetle. Yellow coloured registered maximum (32.7 eggs/5pods) followed by half shattered pod (18.7 eggs). In greengram, yellow pods recorded maximum oviposition (37.3). There was 53.6 per cent more oviposition in yellow pods than the half shattered greengram pods. In redgram, yellow colour pods were the most preferred pods by pulse beetle and the maximum number (36.3 eggs) was laid per 5 pods in yellow pods followed by green pods, striped pods and half shattered pods for egg laying and do not differ significantly . The lowest 3.3 eggs was recorded in immature pods followed by matured pods (8.7 eggs). Blackgram, greengram and redgram recorded as high as 32.7, 32.7 and 36.3 eggs/5 pods, respectively. Pod characters, however, revealed insignificance differences on maximum egg hatching. Undoubtedly, maximum adult emergence was recorded in half shattered pods of green gram (77.9 %), red gram (75.6 %) and black gram (73.6 %).
References
Anonymous. 2010. Selected statistical data storage: where the loss is caused. Pesticides, 4: 125.
Durairaj C. 1999. Integrated management for pigeon pea pod borer complex - A review. In: The second Asia-Pacific Crop Protection Conference, Feb. 18-20, 1999. The Retreat Erangal Beach, Mumbai, India, Pp. 100 - 115.
Ghosal TK, Dutta S, Senapati SK and Deb DC. 2004. Role of phenolcontents in legume Pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.). Journal of Agricultural Entomology 11: 21-38.
Ghosh CC. 1937. The pulse beetles (Pulse beetleae) of Burma. Indian Journal Agriculture Science 7: 395-412.
Lale NES and Kabeh JD. 2004. Pre-harvest spray of neem (Azadirachta indica, A. Juss.) seed products and pirimiphos-methyl as methods of reducing field infestation of cowpeas by storage bruchids in the Nigerian Sudan Savannah. International Journal of Agriculture Biology 6: 987-993.
Ofuya II. 1987. Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) oviposition behaviour on cowpea seeds. Insect Science and Its Applications 8 (1): 77-79.
Raina AK. 1971. Comparative resistance to three species of Callosobruchus in a strain of Chick pea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Stored Product Research 7: 213-216.
Rathore GS and Sharma RC. 2002. Evaluation of moth bean germplasm for resistance to Pulse beetle. Indian Journal of Entomology 2(1):81-86.




